docs: rework itd-114 on two adversarial reviews before its interview - #390
Merged
Conversation
Both reviewers returned NEEDS_WORK and the findings hold. The forge option is reframed from store to number-allocator, inside the 2026-08-19 ledger-canonical decision and typed to itd-129's seam (the critical finding: the draft reversed a recorded decision without a link). The evidence base becomes honest: iss-80 accepted the residual rather than deferring it, and the week that reopened it — three collisions, a release re-cut, the graded field test — replaces the invented messaging anecdote. The id format moves from 'future ADR if adopted' to an ADR seat at planning with a brief-invariant place, per the adr-44 precedent; the stance row cites brief invariant 2 and prefer-sota instead of a principle that does not exist. Scope sections land (forge-as-store, dedup, and remap are out); the SOTA restores the two candidates iss-80 named that the first pass dropped and states the fit criterion as this repository's own id grammar, under which timestamp-numeric is the candidate to beat; the ACs gain oracles — an injectable clock seam, the repo's own consumers as an executable ripple gate, a forge-offline rule, a rollout criterion; Kira takes the maintainer quote per selection-by-role. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
abcd | 0da2f8b | Aug 20 2026, 08:12 AM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
The two-lens adversarial pass the planning-interview prerequisite requires, applied to itd-114. Both reviewers: NEEDS_WORK. Every confirmed finding is worked in:
Decomposition re-run dated 2026-08-20 supersedes the 08-16 table; its calibration grading lands with the interview outcome, since the human confirmation IS the interview.
Deferred deliberately (mint hazard): two ledger captures — the worktree-banlist gap and the persona-lint checks-names-not-roles aside — wait until PR #386's unmerged id block resolves; minting now would collide at 345.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5