refactor(vortex-spatial): execute distance with RowFn - #9616
Performance Regression: -19.15%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2094 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 106 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_neon[16384] |
12.4 µs | 20.4 µs | -38.93% |
| ❌ | Simulation | nullable_point_column_x_constant_point |
619 µs | 793.4 µs | -21.99% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(500, 64, 4)] |
490 µs | 441.8 µs | +10.92% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing nemo/row-fn-spatial-distance (4193db3) with develop (00abf60)
Footnotes
-
106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩