Extend supported sensors#170
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…eck for existance of 'time' key for sensors
…rry complex data from the hardware into sensordata field of the model. Reply on sensordata field to create obs and obs_dicts
…e 0-d scalars squeeze_dims() previously did a blanket np.squeeze(), which removed every singleton dimension instead of just the (num_traj=1, horizon=1) wrapper added by expand_dims(). Single-value observations (e.g. shape (1,)) were squeezed all the way down to 0-d scalars, which then failed to concatenate with other proprio/obs vectors in get_proprioception() and obsdict2obsvec(). Now only squeeze the leading axes that expand_dims actually added, leaving real data dimensions (and pre-existing scalar rwd_dict entries) untouched.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extended robot class to support generic sensor data.