feat(site): news - no, V4-Pro did not roll back - #17
Merged
Conversation
The model tells you it is GPT-4o, so people asked if 0813 was pulled. It was not: the docs version cell still reads DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (captured 2026-08-13, page last modified on the GA day and unchanged), the API still serves it, OpenRouter and NanoGPT list it, the change log is silent. The self-report is confabulation, not a version signal; the docs cell and ds models are. Screenshot attached as the primary source. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Verdict: no rollback. The premise (that V4-Pro-0813 was pulled) does not hold up, so this is the honest post instead of a rollback story.
Verified against every checkable source on 2026-08-13:
deepseek-v4-pro;ds modelslists it.What triggered the suspicion:
deepseek-v4-proself-reports as GPT-4o (3/3 one run), DeepSeek-V3-0324 (another), and flash as Qwen2.5-7B. That is model self-knowledge being unreliable, not a version signal. The post explains this and points to the authoritative signals (docs cell,ds models) — which is a genuine, useful aha for anyone who tests the playground and panics.Opened as a PR, not merged: it's outward-facing and reverses the original hypothesis, so your call on the framing before it publishes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code