Skip to content

docs: align architecture references with v6.2 - #143

Merged
sumitake merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dev/codex/architecture-readme-refresh
Aug 23, 2026
Merged

docs: align architecture references with v6.2#143
sumitake merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dev/codex/architecture-readme-refresh

Conversation

@sumitake

@sumitake sumitake commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Reconcile the public README, package reference, and architecture handbook with the released v6.2.0/runtime 4.1.0 system. This corrects stale 13/17 counts, retired long-context and Composer terminology, project-estimation status, dual-architecture delivery, and the package skill inventory; it also makes stale-state reconciliation the final release-documentation step.

Boundary declaration

  • No provider executor source, raw provider command, credential, private absolute path, retired package tree, downloader, or post-install hook is included.
  • No native-runtime bytes changed; the documentation describes the already released signed dual-architecture artifacts.
  • The change does not create a host-specific preset or provider-specific plugin.

Generated and release surfaces

  • Skill specs and generated SKILL.md files remain in parity.
  • Claude and Codex marketplaces/manifests remain in parity.
  • A unique changelog.d fragment is present; generated CHANGELOG.md is unchanged.
  • Version metadata is unchanged because this is a post-release documentation and regression-test correction for the existing v6.2.0 package, with no behavior, manifest, skill, or packaged runtime byte change.

Verification

  • python3 scripts/build_skills.py --check
  • python3 scripts/build_marketplace.py --check
  • python3 scripts/build-changelog.py --dry-run
  • python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -t . -v
  • python3 -m unittest discover -s scripts -p test_*.py -v
  • python3 scripts/check_release_consistency.py
  • python3 scripts/secret_scan.py
  • python3 scripts/check-public-export-safety.py --active-tree
  • Canonical remote snapshot history export-safety scan passed; the long-lived pre-rewrite clone still retains expected legacy refs and is not treated as current public-history evidence.
  • git diff --check

Review and post-condition

Tier 2. Exact-head distinct-family Gemini governance review APPROVED with zero findings on 66cc5353e2329690b0267efd091291124db44a6a; the canonical execution receipt is recorded in the PR conversation. After merge, verify origin/main contains the corrected 53-skill inventory and manifest-derived 12/14/18 cardinality test.

author: Codex
standing_directives: AGENTS.md; public repository boundaries; fragment-only changelog; exact-head review and merge gates
tier: 2
cross_check: PROCEED — Gemini governance.repository APPROVE on exact head 66cc535; canonical execution receipt recorded in PR comment
post_condition: verify merged main contains current v6.2.0 architecture text and manifest-derived README cardinality regression
mcp_coverage_gap: NONE
contributor_rights: OWNER-AUTHORED
operator_reserved: no

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d7f92767-8320-496c-9439-9525a90bc5c5


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aa30dd8e9d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tests/test_unified_skill_runtime_contract.py Outdated
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

@sumitake

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Final-head review status (66cc535): the one operator-authorized Grok governance.repository attempt failed closed with capability_error/source_containment_failed before any repository read. It produced no governance verdict artifact and no provider_execution_receipt. It was not replayed. The compliance trace remains PENDING and this PR is not merge-authorized despite green CI.

@sumitake

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Exact-head governance evidence for 66cc535 (fresh operator-authorized batch; clean self-contained clone):

  • Reviewer: Gemini / Google lineage
  • Verdict: APPROVE
  • Findings: none
  • Repository reads and cleanup: confirmed

Canonical provider execution receipt:

{"artifact_sha256":"71ebfc6f716d1a1b1ed9eba0cf6ae9516dcac11d26bc6cf0f0fe40d2beb8f348","attempt":{"cleanup_confirmed":true,"failure_phase":"none","inference_started":true,"model_calls":null,"outcome":"succeeded","process_attempts":1,"provider_invocations":1,"provider_turns":null,"schema_version":1,"zero_call_proof":"none"},"evidence_sha256":"86335892669fe824be8ec584f277a36a07e723e7c548b0714440cd74e48aa0e0","executed_edge_ordinal":0,"governance_verdict":"APPROVE","repo_dirty":false,"repo_head":"66cc5353e2329690b0267efd091291124db44a6a","request_sha256":"0f78c6cb5661484628a5a6332a291d8414a62194f4ff226a85494119cea72848","schema_version":1,"selection":{"author_lineage":"openai","edges":[{"activation":"active","agent":"gemini","artifact":"governance_verdict","authority":"read_only","capability":"governance","catalog_digest":"d175125dcc663e455daaec34d9160ac500ba2e5e327b0707fd0485ec9d324259","edge_sha256":"734ecb6bff4d0469ad407c6ba08026cc75038a34f860940b1997c39bcf10bf56","effective_effort":"maximum","effort_class":"maximum","evidence_contract":"repository_reads","family_independence":"distinct_from_author","family_priority":0,"implementation_fingerprint":"a52df3a7e8063a5bfeac5344c270f91cba7ea24916e197ec11aa82ecdd2b324e","intent":"none","logical_action":"governance.repository","model_lineage":"google","model_resolution":"provider_current","model_resolution_method":"provider_default","mutation":"none","observed_model":null,"provider":"agy","provider_action":"gemini/governance.repository","provider_surface":"native_cli","quality_floor":"approved_authority","resource":"agy_pool","resource_kind":"transport_quota","source_mode":"repository","transport_action":["gemini","governance"]}],"effort_class":"maximum","logical_action":"governance.repository","quality_profile":"frontier","routing_schema_version":3,"routing_sha256":"a41494337f39f0fccc7e0e9627f2d5d87dc06b104ed75d0fe3ef4bb756077cd8","selection_sha256":"ab477135c7768816eaad89759d01c28fe8daa844852ed8a4fc95eba2538a6999","target_agent":"gemini"},"source_sha256":"f76ab7ef26c4dec118db3be0046e13c1513aea3d93faf24c3d961b1de3452d45"}

@sumitake
sumitake merged commit cf56ff4 into main Aug 23, 2026
20 checks passed
@sumitake
sumitake deleted the dev/codex/architecture-readme-refresh branch August 23, 2026 03:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant