Skip to content

Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App#705

Open
sgaud-quic wants to merge 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:qcom-6.18.yfrom
sgaud-quic:qcom-6.18.y
Open

Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App#705
sgaud-quic wants to merge 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:qcom-6.18.yfrom
sgaud-quic:qcom-6.18.y

Conversation

@sgaud-quic

@sgaud-quic sgaud-quic commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dummy PR

Signed-off-by: Salendarsingh Gaud <sgaud@qti.qualcomm.com>
@sgaud-quic sgaud-quic requested review from a team, aiquny, ndechesne and shashim-quic June 11, 2026 16:38
@qlijarvis

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR #705 — validate-patch

PR: #705

Verdict Issues Detailed Report
5 Full report

Final Summary

  1. Lore link present: No — no Link tag or lore reference found in commit message
  2. Lore link matches PR commits: N/A — no lore link to compare against
  3. Upstream patch status: Not upstream — explicitly labeled as dummy/test patch; trivial README change would never be accepted upstream
  4. PR present in qcom-next: Not checked — test patch should not be merged to any branch
Verdict: ❌ — click to expand

🔍 Patch Validation

PR: #705 - Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App
Upstream commit: N/A
Verdict: ❌ FAIL

Commit Message

Check Status Note
Subject matches upstream No upstream reference; test patch not suitable for kernel tree
Body preserves rationale Empty body; no technical justification provided
Fixes tag present/correct N/A Not a bug fix
Authorship preserved Author and SOB present
Backport note (if applicable) N/A Not a backport

Diff

File Status Notes
README Trivial test change with no technical merit

Issues

  • Missing commit body: Commit message has no body text explaining the change rationale
  • Non-technical change: Modifying README with "Test" prefix serves no kernel development purpose
  • No upstream reference: No Link tag, no lore.kernel.org reference, no indication of upstream origin
  • Test/dummy nature: Subject explicitly states "Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App" — not a legitimate kernel patch
  • Violates kernel standards: Kernel commits must have technical merit and proper justification

Verdict

Reject — this is an explicitly labeled test/dummy patch with no technical merit, missing commit body, and unsuitable for any kernel tree.

Final Summary

  1. Lore link present: No — no Link tag or lore reference found in commit message
  2. Lore link matches PR commits: N/A — no lore link to compare against
  3. Upstream patch status: Not upstream — explicitly labeled as dummy/test patch; trivial README change would never be accepted upstream
  4. PR present in qcom-next: Not checked — test patch should not be merged to any branch

@qlijarvis

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR #705 — checker-log-analyzer

PR: #705
Checker run: https://github.com/qualcomm-linux/kernel-config/actions/runs/27363053089

Checker Result Summary
Checker Result Summary
checkpatch Missing commit description warning
dt-binding-check ⏭️ Skipped (no DT binding changes)
dtb-check ⏭️ Skipped (no devicetree changes)
sparse-check ⏭️ Skipped (no C source changes)
check-uapi-headers ⏭️ Skipped (no UAPI header changes)
check-patch-compliance Missing required subject prefix
tag-check N/A Not applicable for qcom-6.18.y branch
qcom-next-check N/A Not applicable for qcom-6.18.y branch

Detailed report: Full report

Checker analysis — click to expand

🤖 CI Checker Analysis (checker-log-analyzer)

PR: #705 - Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App
Source: https://github.com/qualcomm-linux/kernel-config/actions/runs/27363053089

Checker Result Summary
checkpatch Missing commit description warning
dt-binding-check ⏭️ Skipped (no DT binding changes)
dtb-check ⏭️ Skipped (no devicetree changes)
sparse-check ⏭️ Skipped (no C source changes)
check-uapi-headers ⏭️ Skipped (no UAPI header changes)
check-patch-compliance Missing required subject prefix
tag-check N/A Not applicable for qcom-6.18.y branch
qcom-next-check N/A Not applicable for qcom-6.18.y branch

❌ checkpatch

Root cause: Commit message lacks a proper description body (only has subject line and Signed-off-by).

Failure details:

WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one

2cbe93afb1bbf34acf884cdc68746609ea43c570 total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 5 lines checked

Commit 2cbe93afb1bb ("Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App") has style problems, please review.

Fix: Add a commit message body between the subject line and the Signed-off-by trailer. The body should explain:

  • What the change does
  • Why the change is needed
  • Any relevant context

Example format:

Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App

This is a test commit to validate the Orbit App integration
with the kernel CI workflow. It makes a trivial change to
the README file for testing purposes.

Signed-off-by: Salendarsingh Gaud <sgaud@qti.qualcomm.com>

Reproduce locally:

./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --summary-file --ignore FILE_PATH_CHANGES --git 055ce4ebf97baac453456414a4e25cd05134ac84..2cbe93afb1bbf34acf884cdc68746609ea43c570

❌ check-patch-compliance

Root cause: Commit subject does not start with a required prefix (UPSTREAM:, FROMLIST:, BACKPORT:, or FROMGIT:).

Failure details:

Checking commit: Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App
Commit summary does not start with a required prefix

Fix: For the qcom-6.18.y branch, all commits must have a subject prefix indicating their origin:

  • UPSTREAM: - Patch already merged in mainline Linux
  • FROMLIST: - Patch posted to upstream mailing list but not yet merged
  • BACKPORT: - Patch backported from a newer kernel version
  • FROMGIT: - Patch from a maintainer's git tree (not yet in mainline)

Since this is a test commit not from upstream, you should either:

  1. Use FROMLIST: prefix if this represents a patch that would be posted upstream
  2. Use UPSTREAM: prefix if this represents an already-merged upstream patch
  3. Consider if this test commit should target a different branch (qcom-next or qcom-next-staging) where prefix requirements may differ

Example:

FROMLIST: Dummy PR for Testing Orbit App

Reproduce locally:

# Check the check-patch-compliance.sh script in kernel-checkers repo
bash kernel-checkers/check-patch-compliance.sh --kernel-src . --base 055ce4ebf97baac453456414a4e25cd05134ac84 --head 2cbe93afb1bbf34acf884cdc68746609ea43c570

Verdict

2 blockers must be fixed before merge:

  1. Add a proper commit message body (checkpatch warning)
  2. Add required subject prefix: UPSTREAM:/FROMLIST:/BACKPORT:/FROMGIT: (check-patch-compliance failure)

All other checkers were appropriately skipped as the PR only modifies the README file (no DT, C source, or UAPI changes).

@rohitbhopatkar

Copy link
Copy Markdown

test

@qswat-orbit-external

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merge Check Failed: No CR Numbers Found

Error: No Change Request numbers were found.

Please add Change Request numbers to your pull request description in the format CRs-Fixed: 12345 or link GitHub issues that are associated with Change Requests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants