Skip to content

qcs8300: Remove the little/big_cpu_sleep_0 idle states#1319

Open
navya-malempati wants to merge 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:tech/all/dt/qcs8300from
navya-malempati:qcs8300
Open

qcs8300: Remove the little/big_cpu_sleep_0 idle states#1319
navya-malempati wants to merge 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:tech/all/dt/qcs8300from
navya-malempati:qcs8300

Conversation

@navya-malempati

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Firmware supports both CPU power collapse (little/big_cpu_sleep_0) and CPU PLL/rail power collapse (little/big_cpu_sleep_1) idle states. However, CPU power collapse modes are often not utilized in favor of performance, so remove the CPU power collapse modes for monaco, aligning with SM8350/SM8450/SM8550/SM8650.

Rename little/big_cpu_sleep_1 as little/big_cpu_sleep_0 since it is now the only CPU idle state in use.

Firmware supports both CPU power collapse (little/big_cpu_sleep_0) and
CPU PLL/rail power collapse (little/big_cpu_sleep_1) idle states.
However, CPU power collapse modes are often not utilized in favor of
performance, so remove the CPU power collapse modes for monaco,
aligning with SM8350/SM8450/SM8550/SM8650.

Rename little/big_cpu_sleep_1 as little/big_cpu_sleep_0 since it is now
the only CPU idle state in use.

Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260522-ml_cpuidle-v1-1-fd311cf33fb4@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Navya Malempati <navya.malempati@oss.qualcomm.com>
@qcomlnxci qcomlnxci requested review from a team, jingyiwang42, mukeshojha-linux and shashim-quic and removed request for a team June 5, 2026 11:16
@qlijarvis

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #1319

PR: #1319
Build run: https://github.com/qualcomm-linux/kernel-config/actions/runs/27011730751

# Error File:Line PR-introduced? Root Cause
1 Merge conflict during integration arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi No The PR modifies monaco.dtsi which has conflicting changes in the baseline integration branch (topic/tech/all/dt/qcs8300). This is an integration conflict, not a code quality issue.

Verdict

This is not a compilation error. The build failed during the git merge phase when integrating the PR with the baseline. The conflict is a pre-existing integration issue between the PR branch and the target integration branch, not a problem with the PR's code itself.

📎 Detailed analysis: Full report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants