feat(map): integrate atomic PineMap codegen semantics#78
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Integrate PineMap semantics atomically across analysis, code generation, support checks, and regression coverage.
This builds on:
Key coverage includes receiver and argument evaluation order, persistent
varmaps, typed and inferredna, UDF/UDT parameters and returns, wrapper-return inference, pair-loop ordering, temporary receivers, history checkpoints, andcalc_on_order_fillsalias/rebind behavior.Supported boundaries
The implementation fails closed for unsupported or ambiguous cases, including:
Validation
52a49a5eda39b031351b3d10aad8bca9cc8b6bef584aac9716dc96e9c6defc09No validation-score change is claimed by this infrastructure milestone.