docs: close out the three-way review backlog - #233
Merged
Conversation
F8, F9 and F15 landed, so §7's table has no open findings left. Records the second batch's discoveries — the event-envelope bug turned out to be the narrow case of a broader one (every item without a payload.message was dropped on resume), the protocol never carried reasoning at all, and it could start/read/resume a thread but not enumerate one. What remains is written down rather than implied: the sidebar's archive and delete buttons still go through Tauri, and the Linux bwrap sandbox has not had the empirical pass macOS got. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
F8, F9 and F15 landed in #229, #230 and #231, so §7's table has no open findings left.
Second-batch discoveries, recorded
item.completedwithout apayload.messagewas dropped on resume — approval, ask_user, error, review_finding. The app-server persisted them faithfully and the UI never showed them again.reasoningTokens. The desktop wasn't a projection bug; there was nothing on the wire.describe()terminator; "no conflict markers left" doesn't mean the file parses. CI and Playwright caught both.Still open, written down rather than implied
thread/archiveis served but isn't the path the button takes — the other half of removing the second reader.Doc-only.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code