OCPBUGS-112062: fix: use native gRPC probes for CatalogSource pods [release-4.22] - #1356
OCPBUGS-112062: fix: use native gRPC probes for CatalogSource pods [release-4.22]#1356twoGiants wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
CatalogSource pods use exec probes that fork a grpc_health_probe binary inside the container. Dynatrace OneAgent injects via LD_PRELOAD into forked processes, adding ~6s startup overhead that exceeds the 5s probe timeout, causing CrashLoopBackOff. Switch to Kubernetes native gRPC probes, where kubelet calls the health endpoint directly from outside the container. Native gRPC probes are GA since Kubernetes 1.24. Issue OCPBUGS-74905 Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 124725122b46c4f02a74aac3a92cf1dfe42f326c
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@twoGiants: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74905, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@twoGiants: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-112062, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@twoGiants: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-112062, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@twoGiants: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-112062, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@twoGiants: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-112062, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.21 |
|
@twoGiants: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.20 |
|
@twoGiants: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.18 |
|
@twoGiants: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
Scheduling required tests: Scheduling tests matching the |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tmshort, twoGiants The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test okd-scos-images |
|
@twoGiants: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Backport of #1346 to release-4.22.
Replace exec-based
grpc_health_probeinvocations with native KubernetesgRPC probe handlers on CatalogSource pod readiness, liveness, and startup
probes. Dynatrace OneAgent LD_PRELOAD injection causes exec probe timeouts
and CrashLoopBackOff. Native gRPC probes run from kubelet outside the
container, avoiding injection.
Upstream PR: operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#3888