Skip to content

OSDOCS-20493-1 updated release notes for 1-1-0#114533

Open
wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
wgabor0427:OSDOCS-20493-1
Open

OSDOCS-20493-1 updated release notes for 1-1-0#114533
wgabor0427 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
wgabor0427:OSDOCS-20493-1

Conversation

@wgabor0427

@wgabor0427 wgabor0427 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
4.21+

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-20493

Link to docs preview:
https://114533--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/security/zero_trust_workload_identity_manager/zero-trust-manager-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Reviewer: All that was done is the xref was added. All of the other text has been verified by QE/SME. Also allowed xrefs in release notes. Thanks.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 2, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

{zero-trust-full} does not remove the legacy custom SCC `spire-spiffe-csi-driver`. After you upgrade {zero-trust-full} to 1.1.0 from the **OpenShift OperatorHub** catalog, remove it manually once CSI is healthy on the platform SCC.

+
See xref:../../security/zero_trust_workload_identity_manager/zero-trust-manager-configuration.adoc#zero-trust-manager-manually-delete-scc_zero-trust-manager-configuration[Manually delete the custom security context constraints]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] OpenShiftAsciiDoc.NoXrefInModules: Do not include xrefs in modules, only assemblies (exception: release notes modules).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wgabor0427 Is this set-up for a link out typical for this slice of the product, or should this be the more standard:

"For more information, see..."

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wgabor0427: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Jul 2, 2026
@maxwelldb maxwelldb self-requested a review July 2, 2026 17:31
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 2, 2026

@maxwelldb maxwelldb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed. One question for @wgabor0427

{zero-trust-full} does not remove the legacy custom SCC `spire-spiffe-csi-driver`. After you upgrade {zero-trust-full} to 1.1.0 from the **OpenShift OperatorHub** catalog, remove it manually once CSI is healthy on the platform SCC.

+
See xref:../../security/zero_trust_workload_identity_manager/zero-trust-manager-configuration.adoc#zero-trust-manager-manually-delete-scc_zero-trust-manager-configuration[Manually delete the custom security context constraints]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wgabor0427 Is this set-up for a link out typical for this slice of the product, or should this be the more standard:

"For more information, see..."

@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Jul 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants