OLS-3683 OLS-3684: regenerate bundle for agentic integration - #1883
OLS-3683 OLS-3684: regenerate bundle for agentic integration#1883blublinsky wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
@blublinsky: This pull request references OLS-3683 which is a valid jira issue. This pull request references OLS-3684 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 49 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ClusterServiceVersion updates its creation timestamp and replaces Lightspeed operator and component image references with new quay.io digests in controller-manager arguments and ChangesCSV image reference refresh
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@bundle/manifests/lightspeed-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml`:
- Around line 1004-1019: Before merging, validate that every production image
referenced by the CSV arguments and relatedImages—including the operator and
operand images under
quay.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant—is promoted and
pullable through the supported release mirror for disconnected OLM
installations. Replace any staging-only image references or digests with
approved mirrorable release artifacts, keeping the CSV argument entries and
relatedImages aligned.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 6cb6714e-6697-4528-985f-452379fa7a08
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
related_images.jsonis excluded by!related_images.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
bundle/manifests/lightspeed-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
| "name": "lightspeed-service-api", | ||
| "image": "registry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9@sha256:73fa6825f8f24c4b893fba177ac415ad4322de56af7940b4a4084a9bc72a7910", | ||
| "revision": "b6f2a8cd7aa17d40e50d082a5ecad02f300a7cb2", | ||
| "image": "quay.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/ols/lightspeed-service@sha256:47aa5eebe78ff91c597a3ad491491c613c51b31bf3ae8c9ab158641f9f46a95c", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we can switch back to production registry registry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/
our releases are back to normal
| "name": "lightspeed-agentic-alerts-adapter", | ||
| "image": "registry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-agentic-alerts-adapter-rhel9@sha256:10af58d31ab3add2e6ec1058ba5d10a87e2d5a4d77258b3f47a0ffc84eff3770", | ||
| "revision": "39bfcdcd8bc7963fe0caa0a6b99c1ad9c919a13d", | ||
| "image": "quay.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-agentic-alerts-adapter@sha256:ef59852b80d8ebc94cd57520a9556aa54cf60c20f6d3c9fd1d65877ad205fa92", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
production registry is not available. we keep quay.io
| { | ||
| "name": "lightspeed-otel-collector", | ||
| "image": "registry.redhat.io/openshift-lightspeed/otelcol-lightspeed-rhel9@sha256:fb86a2c82c959e8ec72e707ce6cc0c4005f806da38ec50da5606557346549cd3", | ||
| "image": "quay.io/redhat-user-workloads/crt-nshift-lightspeed-tenant/lightspeed-otel-collector@sha256:fb86a2c82c959e8ec72e707ce6cc0c4005f806da38ec50da5606557346549cd3", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
production registry is not available. we keep quay.io
dfa7f15 to
ed5cf4a
Compare
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
ed5cf4a to
c9ef6ce
Compare
|
@blublinsky: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Description
Summary
--agentic-sandbox-image) and agentic integration resources from OLS-3683/OLS-3684Type of change
Related Tickets & Documents
Checklist before requesting a review
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit