Jm/hotfix

[parkjinman98]

No description provided.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c59a7fe4dd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[parkjinman98]

@codex review

Addressed in cae7110:

• preserve the non-crowd COCO pose area guard while accepting the official crowd discrepancy;
• validate WiderFace box dtype before checking the no-face sentinel;
• normalize the all-zero WiderFace no-face sentinel before scoring;
• retain the normalized-label fallback for DOTAv1 caches.

Not a review target: the suggestion to reject every nonpositive non-sentinel WiderFace box dimension. The supplied official WIDERFace validation metadata contains non-sentinel zero/negative-size rows, so enforcing that rule conflicts with the approved readiness compatibility direction and would reject the official dataset again.

Verification: 66 focused tests passed; official COCO pose and WIDERFace readiness both pass.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cae7110b1a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[parkjinman98]

@codex review

Addressed the two newly opened review threads in 8fd88c1:

• COCO polygon segmentation now requires rasterized foreground for the union of components, preserving valid official thin components while rejecting an entirely empty mask.
• WiderFace predictions on official no-face sentinel images now count as false positives.

Not a review target (unchanged): the earlier request to reject every non-positive-width/height WiderFace box conflicts with the official WiderFace metadata used by the organizer, which contains non-sentinel zero/negative dimension records. Readiness intentionally remains compatible with that official data.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 8fd88c1bf0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".