Fixing a bug with regex_Like function as Boolean exp - #166
Conversation
|
Note that fixing this bug will hopefully fix #28 at the same time, as I believe it is caused by the same root issue. |
I don't think so but I'll double check |
| ++insideIIf; | ||
| } | ||
| // if identifier is REGEXP_LIKE | ||
| else if(NextTokenMatches(CodeGenerationSupporter.RegexpLike)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be more appropriate to add it to TSql170ParserBaseInternal or whichever version introduces this syntax?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably yes but it's fine since we added other syntaxes here as well. I can rename the function later
|
Leila Lali (@llali) could you release this fix so that we can test it out? |
|
Clement Gutel (@clement911) this should be in 170.128.0 |
|
Ah yes thank you Leila Lali (@llali) , confirming it works now. |
4 participants
Description
Fixes #160
In addition, go through the checklist below and check each item as you validate it is either handled or not applicable to this change.
Code Changes