Skip to content

update feature description#8955

Open
caseysoftware wants to merge 2 commits into
mattermost:masterfrom
caseysoftware:caseysoftware-anonymous-url
Open

update feature description#8955
caseysoftware wants to merge 2 commits into
mattermost:masterfrom
caseysoftware:caseysoftware-anonymous-url

Conversation

@caseysoftware

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Updated the feature description to be consistent with the Features page and licensing

Ticket Link

Fixed issue discovered via internal review

Updated the feature description to be consistent with the Features page and licensing
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ff462cce-70ee-427d-8cc9-41b51d756495

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55f38a8 and b177259.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/end-user-guide/collaborate/rename-channels.rst
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • source/end-user-guide/collaborate/rename-channels.rst

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the "Rename channels" end-user documentation to clarify Channel URL field behaviour. The condition describing anonymous URLs was refined from "anonymous team and channel URLs (Mattermost Enterprise Advanced)" to "anonymous URLs (Mattermost, v11.6.0)," and the text now emphasises that URLs are assigned automatically and do not reflect the channel name.

Changes

Channel URL Documentation Refinement

Layer / File(s) Summary
Channel URL guidance
source/end-user-guide/collaborate/rename-channels.rst
Updated documentation bullet describing Channel URL behaviour when anonymous URLs are enabled, correcting product scope from Enterprise Advanced to Mattermost v11.6.0 and clarifying that URLs are assigned automatically and do not reflect the channel name.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'update feature description' is vague and does not clearly convey the specific change being made to the rename-channels documentation. Consider using a more specific title that references the actual documentation update, such as 'Update Channel URL guidance in rename-channels documentation' or 'Clarify anonymous URL feature requirements in channel documentation'.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description is related to the changeset, mentioning a feature description update for consistency with the Features page and licensing, which aligns with the documentation changes made.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Combs7th

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@caseysoftware - Thank you for the doc update! Can you help sign the CLA as per above so I can help get this update merged for ya?

@Combs7th Combs7th self-requested a review June 19, 2026 02:41
@esethna

esethna commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@caseysoftware reminder we need your help signing the CLA in order to unblock merging PRs you author (this is an automated check). Thanks.

Please help complete the Mattermost contribution license agreement

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants