Perf/optimize leading trailing by jcfangc · Pull Request #17 · jcfangc/bit-string

Performance Gate Passed

🆕 216 new benchmarks
⏩ 182 skipped benchmarks¹

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
🆕	`count_ones/len_4096/alternating/ours_string`	N/A	772.2 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_4096/dense/ours_string`	N/A	772.2 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_4096/sparse/ours_string`	N/A	772.2 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65/alternating/ours_string`	N/A	368.1 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65/dense/ours_string`	N/A	368.1 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65/sparse/ours_string`	N/A	368.1 ns	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65536/alternating/ours_string`	N/A	5.1 µs	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65536/dense/ours_string`	N/A	5 µs	N/A
🆕	`count_ones/len_65536/sparse/ours_string`	N/A	5 µs	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_4096/all_zeros/ours_str`	N/A	836.4 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_4096/all_zeros/ours_string`	N/A	744.7 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_4096/dense/ours_str`	N/A	211.9 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_4096/dense/ours_string`	N/A	150 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/all_zeros/ours_str`	N/A	645.8 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/all_zeros/ours_string`	N/A	553.6 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/alternating/ours_str`	N/A	211.9 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/alternating/ours_string`	N/A	150 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/dense/ours_str`	N/A	211.9 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65/dense/ours_string`	N/A	150 ns	N/A
🆕	`leading_zeros/len_65536/all_zeros/ours_str`	N/A	4.7 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing perf/optimize-leading-trailing (578a926) with main (770e07b)}

182 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩