Experimental support for dynamic container engines and task runtimes per process#1
Draft
abhi18av wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Experimental support for dynamic container engines and task runtimes per process#1abhi18av wants to merge 1 commit into
abhi18av wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
4516542 to
e1d7e7f
Compare
Collaborator
Author
Meeting notes (07-July-2026)
References
======== Webassembly and Bioinformatics
========= We can also create a wasm driver for Nomad |
|
I was playing a little with wasm and I think it will require a lot of changes as nextflow use |
|
I've changed the title of the PR as the intent is not to have a multi-executor but allow to the current executor be aware of every task to be executed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This internal PR highlights the tweaks we need to make sure that nf-nomad is able to utilize multiple task drivers within the same pipeline.
This is very experimental therefore, I'd appreciate if @jagedn can take a look and take this forward whenever he is available next month.