Skip to content

Update tool node to v22.23.0#8830

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/node-22.x
Open

Update tool node to v22.23.0#8830
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/node-22.x

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Jun 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change Pending
node (source) minor 22.21.1 → 22.23.0 v22.23.1

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

nodejs/node (node)

v22.23.0: 2026-06-18, Version 22.23.0 'Jod' (LTS), @​aduh95

Compare Source

This is a security release.

Notable Changes
  • (CVE-2026-48618) tls: normalize hostname for server identity checks (Matteo Collina) – High
  • (CVE-2026-48933) crypto: guard WebCrypto cipher output length (Filip Skokan) – High
  • (CVE-2026-48937) deps: fix integration issues with the latest nghttp2 – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48930) dns,net: reject hostnames with embedded NUL bytes (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48619) http2: cap originSet size to prevent unbounded memory growth (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48615) lib,test: redact proxy credentials in tunnel errors (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48934) tls: bind reusable sessions to authenticated host (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48928) tls: fix case-sensitive SNI context matching (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48617) permission: handle process.chdir on writereport (RafaelGSS) – Low
  • (CVE-2026-48931) http: fix response queue poisoning in http.Agent (Matteo Collina) – Low
  • (CVE-2026-48935) permission: disable FileHandle utimes with permission model (RafaelGSS) – Low
Commits

v22.22.3: 2026-05-13, Version 22.22.3 'Jod' (LTS), @​marco-ippolito

Compare Source

Commits

v22.22.2: 2026-03-24, Version 22.22.2 'Jod' (LTS), @​RafaelGSS prepared by @​aduh95

Compare Source

This is a security release.

Notable Changes
  • (CVE-2026-21637) wrap SNICallback invocation in try/catch (Matteo Collina) - High
  • (CVE-2026-21710) use null prototype for headersDistinct/trailersDistinct (Matteo Collina) - High
  • (CVE-2026-21713) use timing-safe comparison in Web Cryptography HMAC (Filip Skokan) - Medium
  • (CVE-2026-21714) handle NGHTTP2_ERR_FLOW_CONTROL error code (RafaelGSS) - Medium
  • (CVE-2026-21717) test array index hash collision (Joyee Cheung) - Medium
  • (CVE-2026-21715) add permission check to realpath.native (RafaelGSS) - Low
  • (CVE-2026-21716) include permission check on lib/fs/promises (RafaelGSS) - Low
Commits

v22.22.1: 2026-03-05, Version 22.22.1 'Jod' (LTS)

Compare Source

Notable Changes
Commits

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge June 5, 2026 01:16
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 1, 2026 1:32am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 1, 2026 1:32am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 1, 2026 1:32am

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single-line toolchain version bump with no application code changes; standard LTS patch/minor maintenance risk for local and CI environments using mise.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed Node.js toolchain in .config/mise/config.toml from 22.21.1 to 22.23.0, keeping the existing corepack enable postinstall hook. No application source or CI config changes in this diff—only the local/dev runtime version pin.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1a016b4. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jun 5, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.54%. Comparing base (b8971f3) to head (1a016b4).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8830      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.57%   59.54%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1366     1366              
  Lines      132760   132840      +80     
  Branches     6045     6045              
==========================================
+ Hits        79094    79103       +9     
- Misses      52732    52800      +68     
- Partials      934      937       +3
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.24% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.49% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.59% <ø> (+0.18%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 29.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 38.21% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.40% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-core 79.58% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.31% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 75.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 88.04% <ø> (-0.41%) ⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

Comparing deps/tool/node-22.x (1a016b4) with main (7f74e1c)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (d77f370) during the generation of this report, so 7f74e1c was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/node-22.x branch from ebb92c3 to 1a016b4 Compare July 1, 2026 01:18
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool node to v22.22.3 Update tool node to v22.23.0 Jul 1, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.815 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.494 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.253 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$49.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 879 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.972 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.624 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 657 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$86.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 688 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$74.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$52.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$542 \mathrm{ms} \pm 806 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann