Skip to content

Add repo-standardizer skill: polish any GitHub repo surface - #2715

Open
programmingWTF wants to merge 2 commits into
github:mainfrom
programmingWTF:add-repo-standardizer
Open

Add repo-standardizer skill: polish any GitHub repo surface#2715
programmingWTF wants to merge 2 commits into
github:mainfrom
programmingWTF:add-repo-standardizer

Conversation

@programmingWTF

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds repo-standardizer — a skill that polishes any GitHub repository's surface: label taxonomy (emoji rating tiers, P0P3 priority, impact severity), issue forms, PR template, CI workflows (Node/Python/Go/Rust), CODEOWNERS, rulesets, and docs. Repo metadata & config only — never touches code logic.

Why it fits

  • Complements the existing ai-ready skill (which generates AI config files): repo-standardizer handles the repo surface — labels, issue forms, PR template, CI config, branch rulesets, docs
  • Agent-agnostic and idempotent: safe to re-run, never clobbers user content, auth-first dry-run
  • Published on ClawHub (@programmingwtf/repo-standardizer, v1.0.0, clean security scan) with a v1.0.0 release

Details

  • — SKILL.md + 22 templates (labels.json, issue forms, CI workflows, CODEOWNERS, docs)
  • — regenerated via npm run build
  • npm run skill:validate passes (411/411 skills valid)

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 11:33

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills labels Aug 19, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 22 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 0
🟠 Medium 0
ℹ️ Info 0

✅ No matching risk patterns were detected in changed files.

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the skill-check-error Skill validator reported errors label Aug 19, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Vally Lint Results

⛔ Findings need attention

Scope Checked
Skills 1
Agents 0
Total 1
Severity Count
❌ Errors 1
⚠️ Warnings 0
ℹ️ Advisories 0

Summary

Level Finding
repo-standardizer (1/2 checks passed, 1 failed)
Full linter output
### Linting skills/repo-standardizer
❌ repo-standardizer (1/2 checks passed, 1 failed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✗ [valid-refs] 1 of 1 skill(s) have invalid file references.
        ✗ valid-refs: Found 2 invalid file reference(s): README.zh.md (missing), README.md (missing).

1 skill(s) linted, 1 failed

Note: Vally lint returned a non-zero exit code. Please review the findings above before merge.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 12:18

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skill-check-error Skill validator reported errors skills PR touches skills

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants