Skip to content

Clarify the relationship between declaration patterns and is-type#1729

Merged
jskeet merged 1 commit into
dotnet:draft-v8from
jskeet:issue-1661
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

Clarify the relationship between declaration patterns and is-type#1729
jskeet merged 1 commit into
dotnet:draft-v8from
jskeet:issue-1661

Conversation

@jskeet

@jskeet jskeet commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #1661

@jskeet jskeet requested a review from Nigel-Ecma July 13, 2026 10:21
@jskeet

jskeet commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It's entirely possible that there are subtleties that I've missed here... I'm really hoping there aren't cases where both e is T and e is T _ are valid but they're handled differently...

@BillWagner BillWagner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Commenting, because I'd like Nigel to look as well).

I'd be ready to merge this. This looks great.

@Nigel-Ecma Nigel-Ecma left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK

@jskeet jskeet merged commit d3366a4 into dotnet:draft-v8 Jul 14, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review defn of semantics of Declaration pattern

3 participants