Skip to content

fix: update image reference in squad first impressions blog post #68

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
dfberry merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2026
Merged

fix: update image reference in squad first impressions blog post #68

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion website/blog/2026-06-20-squad-first-impressions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ I do not want eight approvals. I want eight different objections.

I also want those objections resolved through agent collaboration, not by pulling me into every pass. Just like a real PR review, reviewers should send issues back to build, build should improve the work, and the review should run again until everyone agrees the bar is met.

![Watercolor illustration of a team examining the same cabinet from different angles](./media/2026-06-20-squad-first-impressions/2026-06-20-squad-first-impressions-watercolor-2-build-review.png)
![Watercolor illustration of a team examining the same cabinet from different angles](./media/2026-06-20-squad-first-impressions/2026-06-19-carpenter-watercolor-table-leg.png)

A single generalist reviewing its own output gives me consistency with itself. That is not the same as complete and correct.

Expand Down
Loading