Skip to content

Restore thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review in cursor-team-kit#95

Merged
ericzakariasson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/restore-thermo-in-team-kit
May 28, 2026
Merged

Restore thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review in cursor-team-kit#95
ericzakariasson merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/restore-thermo-in-team-kit

Conversation

@ericzakariasson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericzakariasson ericzakariasson commented May 28, 2026

Summary

  • Restores the `thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review` skill and agent in cursor-team-kit that were unintentionally removed when the Thermos plugin landed in #92.
  • Original work shipped in #70; Thermos relocated those files out of team-kit, but the intent (per follow-up review) was for team-kit to keep them too.
  • Skill content uses the scrubbed version (no internal-only references) that Thermos already ships; agent file restored verbatim from PR Add thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill and agent #70 (points at the cursor-team-kit plugin for skill lookup).

What changed

File Change
`cursor-team-kit/skills/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review/SKILL.md` restored (scrubbed version)
`cursor-team-kit/agents/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review.md` restored (verbatim from PR #70)
`cursor-team-kit/README.md` added skill + agent rows back; removed "moved to Thermos" pointer

Overlap with Thermos

Users who install both plugins will see two copies of the same rubric (one under team-kit, one under thermos). The agent names differ (`thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review` vs. `thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent`), so they don't collide as Task subagent types. The skill name does collide; that's a known overlap and acceptable.

Test plan

  • `cursor-team-kit` install loads the restored skill and agent
  • Skill content does not reference `lukas-pr-review`, `Sualeh`, or the "Improve code quality" IDE feature name
  • Agent's rubric reference points at the cursor-team-kit plugin (not Thermos)
  • team-kit README skills + agents tables include the restored rows; no "moved to Thermos" line remains

Made with Cursor


Note

Low Risk
Documentation and plugin metadata only; no runtime application code or security-sensitive paths change.

Overview
cursor-team-kit again ships the strict maintainability review workflow that was removed when content moved to the Thermos plugin.

The PR re-adds thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review as a skill (SKILL.md rubric) and a Task subagent that loads that skill from cursor-team-kit (with parallel shell/explore diff gathering documented in the agent). The README skills/agents tables list both entries again and drop the note that thermo-nuclear review lives only in Thermos.

Skill text is the scrubbed public rubric; installing cursor-team-kit and thermos together can duplicate the same skill name while subagent types stay distinct.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b6ebf9e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

The skill and agent originally landed in cursor-team-kit via PR #70
and were unintentionally removed when the Thermos plugin (PR #92)
relocated them. Restoring here so they remain available in team-kit
alongside the standalone Thermos plugin.

- Restore cursor-team-kit/skills/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review/SKILL.md
  using the cleaned-up version (no internal-only references) that
  Thermos already ships.
- Restore cursor-team-kit/agents/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review.md
  verbatim from the original PR (points at the cursor-team-kit plugin
  for skill lookup).
- Add the skill + agent rows back to cursor-team-kit/README.md and
  remove the now-misleading "moved to Thermos" pointer.

Users installing both plugins will see the same skill name in two
places; this is a known overlap and is fine for now.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@ericzakariasson ericzakariasson marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2026 16:12
@ericzakariasson ericzakariasson merged commit 6e3d2ea into main May 28, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant