Skip to content

Add optional ROS transport - #30

Merged
gonzalocasas merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/ros-transport
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Add optional ROS transport#30
gonzalocasas merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/ros-transport

Conversation

@gonzalocasas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Long overdue PR to add a thin layer of interop between compas_eve's transports and roslibpy, effectively adding a RosTransport.

What type of change is this?

  • Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
  • Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
  • I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
  • I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
  • I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas.datastructures.Mesh.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

@chenkasirer chenkasirer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/build.yml
#	.github/workflows/release.yml
#	uv.lock
@gonzalocasas
gonzalocasas merged commit 4602162 into main Aug 19, 2026
14 checks passed
@gonzalocasas
gonzalocasas deleted the feature/ros-transport branch August 19, 2026 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants