Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.13.5 to 1.15.0 - #69

Open
bansikah22 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-74051148ce07a80b20b7ebbb7fc52d28
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade axios from 1.13.5 to 1.15.0#69
bansikah22 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-74051148ce07a80b20b7ebbb7fc52d28

Conversation

@bansikah22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • user-frontend/package.json
  • user-frontend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-15965856
  636  
high severity HTTP Response Splitting
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-15969258
  564  

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@bansikah22

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merge Risk: High

This upgrade to axios v1.15.0 includes security fixes but also introduces a breaking change related to configuration merging to prevent prototype pollution.

Breaking Change in v1.15.0

As part of a security fix, Axios now blocks the merging of the __proto__ key within configuration objects. According to the release notes, if your application relies on "unconventional deep-merging patterns that target the object prototype via Axios config, those operations will now be blocked." [2]

Other Changes

  • v1.15.0: Includes critical security patches for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Header Injection, and adds support for Deno and Bun runtimes. [2, 4]
  • v1.14.0: This version did not have breaking changes but recommended users validate their integration if they rely on environment-based proxy behavior or specific CommonJS resolution edge cases. [2, 5]

Recommendation:
Review your Axios configurations to ensure you are not using deep-merging patterns that modify object prototypes. Given this is a security-driven change, it is a necessary upgrade, but verification is required.

Source: GitHub Releases

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7bbdc114-521d-4155-9faf-441e76596640

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-74051148ce07a80b20b7ebbb7fc52d28

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@amazon-q-developer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Review Failed

I was unable to finalize my review because the pull request head or merge base was modified since I began my review. Please try again.

Request ID: 9737558f-79e2-5bf0-a274-376e31bc5383

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants