Skip to content

chore: pin eslint-plugin-import, jsdoc, and prefer-arrow versions#956

Merged
yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/pin-eslint-plugin-versions
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

chore: pin eslint-plugin-import, jsdoc, and prefer-arrow versions#956
yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/pin-eslint-plugin-versions

Conversation

@yogeshchoudhary147

@yogeshchoudhary147 yogeshchoudhary147 commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Replaces "latest" version specifiers for eslint-plugin-import, eslint-plugin-jsdoc, and eslint-plugin-prefer-arrow with pinned semver ranges (^)
  • Updates package-lock.json to sync eslint-plugin-jsdoc from 63.0.1363.0.14

Using "latest" causes npm ci to fail whenever a new release drops before the lock file is updated, since npm ci requires package.json and package-lock.json to be in sync.

Test plan

  • CI passes (npm ci succeeds on all jobs)
  • Lint, build, and unit tests pass

Replaces "latest" specifiers with pinned semver ranges to prevent
npm ci failures when new versions are released before the lock file
is updated.
@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2026 17:27
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@yogeshchoudhary147, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 44 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a73b8ade-d013-4d61-8c41-8a16b6d97550

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc5109 and 52f79f0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/pin-eslint-plugin-versions

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@developerkunal developerkunal left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 merged commit 4f7efb4 into main Jul 17, 2026
16 of 17 checks passed
@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 deleted the fix/pin-eslint-plugin-versions branch July 17, 2026 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants