让 LLM run 取消与 forwarded-tool 记录回到 Actor 权威#2292
Conversation
eanzhao
added
crnd:lifecycle:managed
🤖 架构审查结论：approveTL;DR
审查依据我按实际 diff 核对了
关键证据：
额外检查结果：没有新增 Old/New refactor-history source comments；没有新增 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: 1871364717d9041b2385db965bb290a7dffed589
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
approve - no architectural compliance concerns found in the PR diff.
## Evidence
- `HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY` is empty and normalizes to `none`; the PR adds no new `Old pattern` / `New principle` / refactor-history source comments in the changed `*.cs` / `*.proto` diff.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:181` adds typed `CancelLlmRunRequested`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:250` adds typed `forwarded_tool_call_records`, matching CLAUDE.md:16 / AGENTS.md:11 core semantic strong-typing rather than a generic bag.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:159` reads the response session through the query port for visibility, then `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:182` dispatches cancellation through `CancelRunAsync`; this preserves CLAUDE.md:49 / AGENTS.md:54 query-vs-business-message separation and CLAUDE.md:53 / AGENTS.md:58 dispatch-port transport abstraction.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:99` builds a `CancelLlmRunRequested` envelope and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:125` sends it through `IActorDispatchPort`, so cancellation remains actor-owned instead of mutating a read-side or host-side fact.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:275` handles `CancelLlmRunRequested` in `LlmSessionGAgent`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:300` persists `LlmRunCancelled`; this aligns with CLAUDE.md:61 / AGENTS.md:78 single authoritative actor ownership.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:148` batches forwarded-tool records into `LlmRunCompleted`, while `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:525` and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:543` apply those records in the same actor transition; this avoids the prior parallel emission path and fits CLAUDE.md:19 / AGENTS.md:13 deletion-first direction.
- Full changed-file scan shows no new `.refactor-loop` / `host.env` production SSOT movement, no new external repo references, and no new `*WriteActor` / `*ReadActor` / `*StoreActor` split.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 tests review: reject，缺少 actor 取消拒绝分支测试TL;DR
测试覆盖结论
阻塞点是两个新增拒绝分支缺少直接行为测试：
我没有发现新增 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: 1871364717d9041b2385db965bb290a7dffed589
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
Reject: test coverage is strong for the happy path and facade behavior, but the new actor-owned cancellation authority has untested rejection branches.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:281` and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:283` add distinct cancellation branches for already-cancelled sessions and terminal non-cancelled sessions, but the only direct new actor test, `HandleCancelLlmRunRequestedAsync_ShouldRecordActorOwnedCancellation` in `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:768`, covers only the successful non-terminal path.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:293` rejects cancellation when the actor already has a different active run, but I found no matching actor test asserting the rejection and preservation of the existing active run/state.
- No added `Task.Delay(...)`, `WaitUntilAsync(...)`, `[Skip]`, manual traits, or bump-only assertions were found in the PR test diff; the existing added tests for `LlmRunCore`, facades, adapter envelopes, proto surface, and atomic forwarded-tool completion records are behavior assertions.
## What would change your verdict (only if comment or reject)
Add direct `LlmSessionGAgentTests` for `HandleCancelLlmRunRequestedAsync` covering terminal-session rejection and active-run-id mismatch, asserting both the error and that no cancellation event/state mutation is recorded. An idempotency test for already-cancelled sessions would also close the remaining branch.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:reject⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 Quality review approveTL;DR
质量复核结论我按三点展开检查: 新增公开接口是否有生产调用、运行态决策对象是否过度抽象、取消与 forwarded tool record 的状态写入是否集中且可读。 结果是 approve。 是 LLM session 注册端口上的取消运行命令，已由 Responses facade 调用并由 infrastructure adapter 发送 actor command； 是 run sink 返回的记录/停止派发决策，消费面收敛在 和 ，不是无理由扩散的新抽象。新增测试 double 和 helper 也都有对应断言覆盖，没有看到死代码或明显 unrelated cleanup。 当前未设置，按规则归一为 ；本轮 diff 也没有新增 / / 源码注释，所以 self-doc comment 策略没有质量阻塞。 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)pr: 2292
|
🤖 Quality review approve (corrected body)TL;DR
质量复核结论上一条评论的正文部分有几个 code identifier 被 shell 渲染时吃掉；这里补发可读版本，结论不变。 我按三点展开检查: 新增公开接口是否有生产调用、运行态决策对象是否过度抽象、取消与 forwarded tool record 的状态写入是否集中且可读。 结果是 approve。
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)pr: 2292
|
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is @@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/integrate #2292 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 84.08% 84.00% -0.08%
=====================================================
Files 1139 1197 +58
Lines 82320 91116 +8796
Branches 10705 11919 +1214
=====================================================
+ Hits 69219 76543 +7324
- Misses 8414 9289 +875
- Partials 4687 5284 +597
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 173 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
🤖 测试视角审查通过TL;DR
测试覆盖结论
我没有发现新增 关键证据:
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: 1871364717d9041b2385db965bb290a7dffed589
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the changed LLM run/session behavior has direct behavior tests, no skip/manual/polling regressions, and no assertion loosening that creates a test-quality blocker.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:769` covers the new actor-owned `CancelLlmRunRequested` path by asserting session status, active run id/status, and the persisted `LlmRunCancelled` event payload.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:1294` covers forwarded-tool recording moving into `LlmRunCompleted`: it asserts no standalone `LlmSessionForwardedToolCallEmittedEvent`, verifies `ForwardedToolCallRecords`, and checks actor state plus completion tool calls.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:140` covers the new `LlmRunRecordDecision.Stop` sink contract by asserting terminal records are not dispatched after a stopped forwarded tool observation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:427` and `test/Aevatar.Capabilities.Tests/MainnetResponsesEndpointsTests.cs:1344` verify cancel requests now route through `CancelRunAsync` with the expected actor id, response id, and run id, rather than host-side status mutation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:113` verifies `CancelRunAsync` dispatches a typed `CancelLlmRunRequested` envelope and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:143` covers its argument validation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:54` checks the new proto surface for `CancelLlmRunRequested` and `forwarded_tool_call_records`.
- Static diff scan found no added `[Skip]`, manual category traits, `Task.Delay`, `Thread.Sleep`, `WaitUntilAsync`, `Assert.True(true)`, or polling allowlist changes.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 Quality review r2: approveTL;DR
质量复审结论我按
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: quality
head_sha: 1871364717d9041b2385db965bb290a7dffed589
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the PR keeps the run cancellation and forwarded-tool recording changes focused, uses domain-specific names, and does not introduce dead code, unnecessary abstraction, or readability blockers.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Ports/ILlmSessionRegistrationPort.cs:20` adds `CancelRunAsync`, and it has a production caller in `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:182` plus a concrete adapter implementation at `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:99`, so the new public surface is reachable.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Responses/LlmRunCoreContracts.cs:41` introduces `LlmRunRecordDecision`; the name describes the narrow sink-recording contract and is consumed directly by `LlmRunCore` and `LlmSessionGAgent` rather than becoming a broad single-use abstraction.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:119`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:135`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:183` add stop decisions only at dispatch boundaries. The surrounding loop was already large before this PR, and the new checks are small, localized, and not duplicated enough to justify extraction.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:276` keeps cancellation authority in the session actor, while `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:728` contains forwarded-tool-record upsert in a focused helper instead of scattering state mutation through the run loop.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:140`, `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:765`, and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:113` exercise the newly introduced sink stop decision, actor-owned cancellation command, and adapter envelope path, so I do not see dead test-only additions.
- Refactor self-doc policy: `HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY` is unset in this environment and normalizes to `none`; the diff adds no new `Refactor` / `Old pattern` / `New principle` source comments, and missing self-doc is not a reject reason under this policy.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:quality:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 Architect review: approveTL;DR
架构复核结论我按三点核对了实际三点 diff: actor 权威、强类型协议、以及 Application/Infrastructure 是否绕过 write-model 状态。
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: 1871364717d9041b2385db965bb290a7dffed589
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
approve - no architectural compliance concern from the CLAUDE/AGENTS angle; the PR moves LLM run cancellation and forwarded-tool records back under the LlmSession actor's typed authority.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:181` adds `CancelLlmRunRequested` as a typed protobuf command, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:274` adds `forwarded_tool_call_records` on `LlmRunCompleted`; this aligns with CLAUDE.md "核心语义强类型：影响业务语义、控制流、稳定读取且仓库内可控的数据，必须建模为 `proto field / typed option / typed sub-message`，禁止塞入通用 bag。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:275` handles cancellation in `LlmSessionGAgent`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:600` applies `LlmRunCancelled` to session/run state and open forwarded tool calls; this aligns with CLAUDE.md "单一权威拥有者：每个稳定业务事实有唯一 actor 拥有；`committed event store + actor state` 是唯一真相，readmodel 只是查询副本。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:543` applies forwarded tool call records from the run completion event, while `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:150` batches those records into `LlmRunCompleted` instead of emitting a separate forwarded-tool side event from the run core; this aligns with CLAUDE.md "领域事件只在拥有它的 Actor/模块内发布；跨模块交互走 command/event 协议，不直接 raise 别处的 event。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:99` dispatches `CancelLlmRunRequested` through `IActorDispatchPort`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:182` uses that command for cancellation instead of writing a terminal status from the facade; this aligns with CLAUDE.md "写侧端口只负责 lifecycle/command；读取走窄 query contract 或 projection，禁止 Application/Infrastructure 直读 write-model 内部状态。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:757` through `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:833` gates run event persistence on the active actor-owned run and terminal state, which supports CLAUDE.md "业务推进内聚：工作流推进（成功/失败/分支/重试）在 Actor 事件处理流程内完成，保证顺序性与可重放性。"
- Old/New pattern comment policy: `HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY` is unset, so it normalizes to `none`; the added diff contains no new `Refactor` / `Old pattern` / `New principle` source comments. Existing surrounding comments were not treated as new violations.
- No new `*WriteActor` / `*ReadActor` / `*Store` actor split, no new external repo dependency, no `.refactor-loop/host.env` or host production SSOT movement, and no compatibility shim / empty-forwarding layer was introduced in the reviewed `*.cs` / `*.proto` diff.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
…/iter2275-issue-2275 # Conflicts: # test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs
🤖 测试视角 review 结论: approveTL;DR
测试证据
关键验证结果:
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: 3da4567f8a3507951996150dc70381fb78a60cf8
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the changed LLM run/session behavior has focused behavior tests, no new unstable pacing or skips, and the targeted suites pass.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:80` asserts forwarded tool calls are batched into `LlmRunCompleted.ForwardedToolCallRecords`, including call id, tool name, schema hash, and parsed arguments.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:140` covers the new sink stop decision by proving a stopped forwarded-tool observation does not dispatch completion, failure, or cancellation terminal records.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:800` covers actor-owned cancellation by asserting session status, active run id/status, and persisted `LlmRunCancelled`.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:1325` covers the forwarded-tool atomic completion path and includes a source-regression assertion that no separate `LlmSessionForwardedToolCallEmittedEvent` is persisted.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:113` and `:143` cover the new public `CancelRunAsync` adapter surface for envelope payload and required-argument validation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:427`, `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ChatCompletionsCommandFacadeTests.cs:481`, and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/MessagesCommandFacadeTests.cs:205` assert the host/facade observation paths return errors without writing session terminal status, matching the actor-authoritative status policy.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:54` covers the new protobuf surface for `CancelLlmRunRequested` and `forwarded_tool_call_records`.
- Stability review: touched-test diff adds no `[Skip]`, no `[Trait("Category","Manual")]`, no `Task.Delay`/`Thread.Sleep`/`WaitUntilAsync`, and no polling allowlist change.
- Verification passed: `dotnet test test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests.csproj --no-restore --filter "FullyQualifiedName~LlmRunCoreTests|FullyQualifiedName~LlmSessionGAgentTests|FullyQualifiedName~LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests|FullyQualifiedName~LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests|FullyQualifiedName~ResponsesCommandFacadeTests|FullyQualifiedName~ChatCompletionsCommandFacadeTests|FullyQualifiedName~MessagesCommandFacadeTests" --nologo` passed 150 tests, 0 skipped.
- Verification passed: `dotnet test test/Aevatar.Capabilities.Tests/Aevatar.Capabilities.Tests.csproj --no-restore --filter "FullyQualifiedName~MainnetResponsesEndpointsTests|FullyQualifiedName~MainnetMessagesEndpointsTests|FullyQualifiedName~MainnetChatCompletionsEndpointsTests" --nologo` passed 84 tests, 0 skipped.
- Verification passed: `bash tools/ci/test_stability_guards.sh`.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 Quality review 通过TL;DR
质量复审结论我按三点差异核对了实现: 具体证据:
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: quality
head_sha: 3da4567f8a3507951996150dc70381fb78a60cf8
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the PR keeps cancellation and forwarded-tool recording changes focused, reachable, and readable with no quality-blocking dead code or over-engineering found.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Responses/LlmRunCoreContracts.cs:18`: `ILlmRunSink` remains the existing sink abstraction; the new `LlmRunRecordDecision` is consumed by all sink methods and by the run core/actor path, so it is not dead public surface.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:119`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:135`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:183`: stop decisions are localized to existing dispatch checkpoints; `RunLlmLoopAsync` was already larger than the preferred size, and this PR adds small guard checks rather than a new oversized flow.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:276`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:757`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:816`: cancel and record-decision helpers stay cohesive around actor-owned run state; names express the business intent and avoid generic `Manager`/`Helper` vocabulary.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:99` and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:182`: `CancelRunAsync` has both a production caller and an adapter implementation; related test fixtures implement the added interface method without introducing unused behavior.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:181` and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:266`: the new protobuf command/field are typed and scoped to actor-owned cancellation and forwarded-tool records, with no unrelated drive-by cleanup found in the diff.
- `${HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY}` was empty, so it normalizes to `none`; the diff did not add new `Refactor`/`Old pattern`/`New principle` source comments.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:quality:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
…/iter2275-issue-2275 # Conflicts: # src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto # src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Responses/LlmRunCoreContracts.cs # src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs # src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs # test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs
🤖 架构评审：reject（针对提示指定 head_sha）TL;DR
架构阻塞点
修复方向：保留已有显式 scheduler/dispatch contract，或把 actor 需要的运行依赖建模为显式注入/绑定依赖；不要在 handler 中用 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: 3da4567f8a3507951996150dc70381fb78a60cf8
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
Reject: the requested head introduces a Service Locator dependency inside `LlmSessionGAgent`, violating the explicit CLAUDE dependency rule.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:345` resolves `ILlmRunCore` via `Services.GetRequiredService<ILlmRunCore>()` inside the actor instead of declaring the dependency explicitly. This is newly introduced at the reviewed head and violates `CLAUDE.md` / 设计模式约束（强制）: "不用 `Service Locator` 隐藏依赖——依赖一律构造注入、显式可见."
## What would change your verdict (only if comment or reject)
Move the LLM run execution dependency out of the actor-side service locator path: either keep the run execution behind the existing explicit scheduler/dispatch contract, or expose an explicit actor/runtime dependency that is injected by construction/binding rather than fetched from `Services` in the handler. Then rerun the architecture review on the updated head.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:reject⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 测试视角复审通过TL;DR
测试覆盖结论本次变更把 LLM run 取消和 forwarded-tool 记录收回到 Actor 权威路径；Actor 这里指持有会话事实并串行提交事件的运行单元。测试侧已覆盖核心行为：
我也扫了新增测试 diff，没有发现新增 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: fdda1b574d7ef608582c66fd74a972d9b594819c
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: test coverage and test quality are adequate for the actor-owned cancellation and forwarded-tool recording changes.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:48` covers forwarded tool calls being batched into `LlmRunCompleted.ForwardedToolCallRecords` while still preserving the runtime tool-call shape.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:140` covers `LlmRunRecordDecision.Stop` by asserting the core stops dispatching terminal records after the sink rejects a tool observation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:142` covers executor dispatch ordering for streamed chunks, observed forwarded tool call, and terminal completion with the batched forwarded-tool record.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:294` and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:321` cover cancellation/failure command dispatch from the executor path.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:803` covers actor-owned cancellation through `CancelLlmRunRequested`, including committed `LlmRunCancelled` event evidence.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:1140` covers the actor applying forwarded-tool records from run completion into session state and completion output.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:413` covers terminal forwarded-tool protection by rejecting result/resolve attempts after cancellation while preserving state version and cancelled status.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:427` covers `/responses/{id}/cancel` calling actor-owned cancel instead of writing generic session status; `:712`, `:742`, and `:819` cover observed cancelled/timed-out runs returning errors without status writes.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:143` covers `CancelRunAsync` argument validation, and the same file's new dispatch test verifies `CancelLlmRunRequested` payload fields.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:71` covers the new proto surface for `CancelLlmRunRequested` and `forwarded_tool_call_records`.
- Static diff scan found no added `[Skip]`, manual-category traits, sleep/delay pacing, `Assert.True(true)`, or bump-only tests; assertion changes from `ContainSingle(status)` to `BeEmpty()` are tied to the new actor-owned lifecycle behavior and are backed by replacement assertions on `CancelledRuns`.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 PR 2292 quality review: rejectTL;DR
质量发现
建议改动：删除 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: quality
head_sha: fdda1b574d7ef608582c66fd74a972d9b594819c
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
Reject: the refactor leaves the old forwarded-tool record command/handler as an uncalled public command surface, which is dead code and keeps the non-atomic path alive.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:315`: `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` remains as a top-level command message, but after this PR `git grep` on the PR head shows no production caller constructing it; forwarded tool records now travel through `RecordLlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records`.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:484`: `HandleRecordForwardedToolCallEmittedAsync` remains as an actor handler for that orphan command, so the old split "emit forwarded tool call separately from completion" path is still present even though the new code path no longer uses it.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:45`: the proto surface regression test still requires `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted`, which locks in the dead command instead of enforcing the new batched completion surface.
## What would change your verdict (only if comment or reject)
Delete `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` and `HandleRecordForwardedToolCallEmittedAsync`, remove its proto-surface assertion, and keep forwarded-tool record persistence only through `RecordLlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records` / `LlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records`.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:quality:reject⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 architect review：reject，
|
| 位置 | 问题 | 为什么阻塞 |
|---|---|---|
src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:259 |
DispatchingLlmRunSink.DispatchAsync 在 dispatch(...) 返回后直接 return LlmRunRecordDecision.Continue; |
这里只知道消息被接收进 inbox，不知道 actor 是否已拒绝/终止 run，违反 ACK 诚实。 |
src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:120 / :137 |
LLM loop 用 LlmRunRecordDecision 决定是否停止 |
上游把 accepted-only 伪装成 record decision，会让取消后的 stop 语义失效。 |
src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:135 / :162 |
forwarded tool 仍先记录 observed，再单独记录 completed | #2275 共识要求 observed/emitted/completed 一个 actor turn；当前仍有 split record dispatch 的半提交窗口。 |
需要改成：LlmRunRecordDecision 由 actor-owned handled/committed contract 返回，不能由 IActorDispatchPort admission 推导。可选方向是窄同步 actor command 返回真实 StopDispatching，或通过 committed/observed event 的显式 observation contract 等待 actor 决策。forwarded-tool terminal path 也需要一个 actor command/turn 提交，不要分散成独立 accepted dispatch。
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)
---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: fdda1b574d7ef608582c66fd74a972d9b594819c
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
reject - the off-actor run sink exposes an actor-handled `LlmRunRecordDecision`, but the implementation returns `Continue` after accepted-only dispatch, so cancellation cannot truthfully stop the executor from further dispatch.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Responses/LlmRunCoreContracts.cs:25` introduces `ILlmRunSink` methods returning `Task<LlmRunRecordDecision>`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:120` / `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:137` use that decision to decide whether to stop the LLM loop. However `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:259` returns `LlmRunRecordDecision.Continue` immediately after `dispatch(recordId, command, ct)` completes. In this codebase `IActorDispatchPort.DispatchAsync` is accepted-only: `src/Aevatar.Foundation.Abstractions/IActorDispatchPort.cs:70` says "Completion only means accepted-for-dispatch with a stable command id; it does not mean handled, committed, or observed by a read model." This violates CLAUDE.md `Command / Envelope / Dispatch（强制）`: "ACK 诚实：同步返回只承诺已达到阶段（默认 `accepted + stable command id`）；`committed`/`read-model observed` 等强保证须通过独立契约或异步观察获取。" It also violates the same section's "投递语义 runtime-neutral：`publish/send` 统一表示\"进入目标 inbox\"；不因目标 `self` 或底层差异退化为 inline dispatch；需立即执行走独立 `dispatch` 契约，禁止绕过 publisher 直操底层传输对象。"
- The practical regression is in the PR's core architectural goal: `/cancel` now records `CancelLlmRunRequested` into `LlmSessionGAgent` at `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:277`, and the actor-side in-process sink can compute `Stop` from actor state at `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1054`. But the off-actor executor path never observes that actor-owned decision; it only observes dispatch admission and keeps producing `Continue`. That undermines CLAUDE.md `权威状态 / ReadModel / Projection（强制）`: "单一权威拥有者：每个稳定业务事实有唯一 actor 拥有；`committed event store + actor state` 是唯一真相，readmodel 只是查询副本。" The stop/continue fact is made outside the actor in `DispatchingLlmRunSink`, not by the actor-owned record contract.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:135` still records forwarded tool observation through `RecordToolCallObservedAsync`, then `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:162` separately records completion carrying `ForwardedToolCallRecords`; `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:512` then persists only `LlmRunCompleted`. This does not implement the authorized source issue / consensus requirement that forwarded-tool observed/emitted/completed be one actor turn. It is secondary to the ACK violation above, but it is the same architectural boundary: split record dispatches can be accepted while the actor later rejects a terminal record after cancellation, leaving the executor with a false `Continue`.
## What would change your verdict
Make `LlmRunRecordDecision` come from an actor-owned handled/committed contract, not from `IActorDispatchPort` admission. Concretely, either route record writes through a narrow synchronous actor command contract that actually returns the actor's `StopDispatching` decision after the turn, or model the decision as a committed/observed event that the executor awaits through an explicit observation contract. Also collapse the forwarded-tool terminal path into one actor command/turn so observed forwarded tool calls and terminal completion cannot be split across independently accepted dispatches.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:reject⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
eanzhao
added
crnd:phase:fixing
📊 状态卡片 — fix 派出
🤖 controller status banner ⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 architect review: approveTL;DR
架构合规结论本轮重点看了 结论是 approve：取消 run 和 forwarded-tool 终态记录都回到了 actor-owned command/event 路径。 我也按 host policy 做了边界检查： 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: fdda1b574d7ef608582c66fd74a972d9b594819c
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
approve: no architectural compliance concerns found; the diff moves cancellation and forwarded-tool terminal records toward actor-owned commands/events without introducing a new PROJECT_RULES/AGENTS violation.
## Evidence
- No blocking issues found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:277` handles `CancelLlmRunRequested` inside the actor, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:866` applies cancellation by mutating actor-owned state through `LlmRunCancelled`, matching CLAUDE.md: "单一权威拥有者：每个稳定业务事实有唯一 actor 拥有；`committed event store + actor state` 是唯一真相，readmodel 只是查询副本。"
- No blocking issues found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:791` folds `forwarded_tool_call_records` into the same `LlmRunCompleted` transition, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:269` models that data as a typed repeated proto field, matching CLAUDE.md: "核心语义强类型：影响业务语义、控制流、稳定读取且仓库内可控的数据，必须建模为 `proto field / typed option / typed sub-message`，禁止塞入通用 bag。"
- No blocking issues found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:221` no longer writes cancellation as a generic observation-lifecycle status update, while `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:81` dispatches a typed cancellation command through `IActorDispatchPort`, matching CLAUDE.md: "读写分离：`Command -> Event`，`Query -> ReadModel`；异步完成通过事件通知，不在会话内拼装流程。"
- Host policy checks: `HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY` is unset and normalized to `none`; the diff adds no new Old/New/iteration refactor-history source comments. `HOST_ARCHITECTURE_GREP_CHECKS` and `HOST_PROTO_POLICY` are unset, so review stayed on actual diff evidence and PROJECT_RULES/AGENTS clauses. No new external repo references, no host production SSOT moved into `.refactor-loop/`, and no new `*WriteActor` / `*ReadActor` / `*Store` split was introduced.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 质量审查结论: rejectTL;DR
质量问题
建议二选一:
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)pr: 2292
|
🤖 tests 视角 approve：覆盖足够，未发现测试质量阻断TL;DR
测试覆盖核查我按 关键证据:
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: fdda1b574d7ef608582c66fd74a972d9b594819c
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the changed LLM run/session behavior has focused regression coverage, and I found no test-quality blocker in the PR diff.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:48` / `RunAsync_ShouldEmitForwardedToolCallAndComplete` asserts the new business outcome that forwarded tool facts are batched on `LlmRunCompleted.ForwardedToolCallRecords`, while still exposing runtime forwarded tool calls for completion rendering.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:140` / `RunAsync_WhenSinkStopsAfterToolObservation_ShouldStopDispatchingTerminalRecords` covers the new `LlmRunRecordDecision.Stop` branch by asserting no completed/failed/cancelled terminal record is emitted after the sink stops dispatch.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:803` / `HandleCancelLlmRunRequestedAsync_ShouldRecordActorOwnedCancellation` verifies the new actor-owned cancellation command persists an `LlmRunCancelled` event and moves actor state to cancelled.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:1564` / `HandleLlmRunRequestedAsync_ShouldRecordForwardedToolCallAtomicallyWithCompletion` asserts the no-regression rule that forwarded tool calls no longer create a separate `LlmSessionForwardedToolCallEmittedEvent`; they are recorded atomically with run completion and materialized into actor state.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:427` / `CancelAsync_ShouldRejectInvisibleResponse_AndCancelVisibleResponseThroughActor` verifies `/v1/responses/:id/cancel` now calls `CancelRunAsync` with the canonical `responseId:llm-run` identity instead of writing a plain session status.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ChatCompletionsCommandFacadeTests.cs:538`, `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/MessagesCommandFacadeTests.cs:301`, and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:682` cover the facade regression that observed terminal run errors return the protocol error without writing duplicate session status updates.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:142` verifies off-actor dispatch order and record IDs after forwarded tool-call records moved from a standalone command to `RecordLlmRunCompleted.ForwardedToolCallRecords`.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:455` and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:483` cover the new `CancelRunAsync` adapter command surface and the proto surface for `CancelLlmRunRequested` / `forwarded_tool_call_records`.
- Diff scan found no new `[Skip]`, manual category, `Task.Delay`, `Thread.Sleep`, `WaitUntilAsync`, or assertion-only bump tests in the touched test files.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 PR 2292 round 1 fix 已完成TL;DR
修复摘要
验证
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)# Fix report for PR 2292 round 1
## Applied
- (A) src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:279: `LlmRunRecordDecision` now comes from committed observation, not `IActorDispatchPort` admission. `DispatchingLlmRunSink` prepares the LLM session observation lease, attaches the existing response projection sink, dispatches the record command, and waits for `CommittedStateEventPublished.StateEvent.EventData` carrying the matching record id before returning `Continue` or `Stop`. This addresses reviewer:architect's evidence #1 and the cited `CLAUDE.md` ACK honesty / actor-owned authority clauses.
- (A) src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:131: forwarded tool records now collapse into one terminal `RecordLlmRunCompleted` command by populating `ForwardedToolCallRecords` directly on completion instead of emitting a separate forwarded tool observation. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:315` now exposes only `RecordLlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records` / `LlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:483` no longer has `HandleRecordForwardedToolCallEmittedAsync`, and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:56` asserts that `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` is absent. This addresses reviewer:architect's evidence #3 and reviewer:quality's evidence #1-#3.
- (A) test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:172: the executor tests now use an observation-backed dispatch harness that publishes committed record events before the sink decides whether to continue. `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:197` asserts the forwarded-tool path dispatches only chunk, chunk, completed, with the forwarded tool record batched on completion.
- (A) test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:80: the core tests now assert forwarded tool calls do not generate separate tool-call sink records and that the forwarded record is present on the completion event.
## Rejected as false positive
- none
## Blocked (cannot fix this round)
- none
## Build status
- build: pass (`dotnet build aevatar.slnx --nologo`; warnings only, 0 errors)
- tests: pass (`dotnet test test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests.csproj --nologo`; 946 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped)
- guard: pass (`bash tools/ci/test_stability_guards.sh`)
- review-thread-completion: not applicable; `/Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.refactor-loop/state/review-thread-completion/pr2292.json` is absent.
## Recommendation for next round
- Expect next Consensus-rnd Phase review-gate round can reach MERGE or MERGE_WITH_COMMENTS: both reject demands were applied in-scope, no false positives were needed, and no blockers remain.
- refactor self-doc: not applicable (HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY=none)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
FIX_DONE:2292:round-1:applied-4:rejected-0:blocked-0⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
eanzhao
added
crnd:phase:reviewing
🤖 Quality reviewer: reject，发现未接入的 in-actor 记录路径TL;DR
质量发现
建议处理方式: 删除 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: quality
head_sha: f9aa0631f2b2e4a718b1a4f49518ab93077af7fe
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
Reject: the PR introduces an unused in-actor LLM run sink and its supporting persistence helpers, leaving a second unexercised record path in a file that already has the actor event-handler path and the off-turn dispatching sink.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1125` declares the new private `InActorLlmRunSink`, but `git grep` on the PR head finds no `new InActorLlmRunSink` or other call site. The actor now starts execution by scheduling `_executionScheduler` from `TryCommitRunStartedAsync`, while `LlmRunExecutor` uses `DispatchingLlmRunSink`; this nested sink is unreachable dead code.
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1026`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1035`, `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1044`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1053` add private persistence helpers for stream chunks, tool calls, completion, and failure that are only called by the unused `InActorLlmRunSink`. Keeping them makes the actor read as if it supports two LLM run recording flows, but only the dispatch/event-handler flow is actually exercised.
## What would change your verdict
Delete `InActorLlmRunSink` and the private helpers that exist only to support it, or wire that sink into a real actor execution path with tests that prove why the in-actor path must coexist with the off-turn `DispatchingLlmRunSink`.⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 架构 Review：approveTL;DR
架构证据
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: f9aa0631f2b2e4a718b1a4f49518ab93077af7fe
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
approve — the diff moves LLM run cancellation and forwarded-tool-call recording back to the LlmSessionGAgent authority without introducing an architecture-rule regression.
## Evidence
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:185` adds `CancelLlmRunRequested` as a typed protobuf command, matching CLAUDE.md: "核心语义强类型：影响业务语义、控制流、稳定读取且仓库内可控的数据，必须建模为 `proto field / typed option / typed sub-message`，禁止塞入通用 bag。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:101` keeps the formal LLM execution path on `ChatStreamAsync`, matching CLAUDE.md: "AI 对话主链必须流式化：实时会话入口必须使用 `ChatStreamAsync`；`ChatAsync` 仅可用于明确的非交互式离线场景。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:134` records forwarded tool calls as part of `LlmRunCompleted.ForwardedToolCallRecords` instead of emitting the removed `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` pathway, which aligns with CLAUDE.md: "单一主干，插件扩展：只保留一条权威业务主链路；新能力以插件/模块挂载，禁止平行\"第二系统\"。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:277` handles cancellation inside the session actor and persists `LlmRunCancelled`, matching CLAUDE.md: "单一权威拥有者：每个稳定业务事实有唯一 actor 拥有；`committed event store + actor state` 是唯一真相，readmodel 只是查询副本。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:483` accepts run completion records inside the actor and assigns actor-owned sequence values, matching CLAUDE.md: "面向对象内聚：同一业务实体的状态、命令处理、事件发布在同一个 actor 内完成；禁止将数据和方法拆分到不同 actor 再拼装。"
- `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:151` dispatches record commands through `IActorDispatchPort` and observes committed results before continuing; I found no query-time replay, event-store side read, in-process ID registry, new `*WriteActor`/`*ReadActor`/`*Store` split, external repo dependency, `.refactor-loop` host fact movement, or new Old/New refactor-history source comments in the added diff.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 测试视角通过：新增权威取消与 forwarded-tool 记录已有行为覆盖TL;DR
测试证据Actor 是持有 session 权威状态的运行单元；off-actor executor 是从 Actor turn 外执行 LLM 流并把记录再投回 Actor 的组件。本轮只查测试角度，没有评价生产架构。
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: f9aa0631f2b2e4a718b1a4f49518ab93077af7fe
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the PR has behavior-oriented coverage for the new actor-owned cancellation, forwarded-tool batching, and off-actor record-observation flow, with no test stability or assertion-loosening red flags found.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:20` covers `StartAsync` admission and then the off-actor `ExecuteAsync` record dispatch path; assertions check accepted admission fields, direct envelopes, record ids, chunk content, and final completion rather than just mock invocation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:144` covers the forwarded-tool behavior change: forwarded calls are no longer separate `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` records and are asserted as `ForwardedToolCallRecords` batched on `RecordLlmRunCompleted`.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:47` and `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:139` cover the core behavior change: forwarded tools complete with batched records, and a sink stop decision prevents terminal records from being emitted.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:802` covers `CancelLlmRunRequested` as an actor-owned cancellation command, asserting state status, active run identity, and the committed `LlmRunCancelled` event.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:1563` covers forwarded-tool records becoming authoritative through `LlmRunCompleted`, including a regression assertion that no standalone `LlmSessionForwardedToolCallEmittedEvent` is emitted.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:426` covers the Responses cancel facade routing to `CancelRunAsync` with the canonical run id instead of writing session status directly.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:112` and `:139` cover the new public `CancelRunAsync` adapter method for both dispatch payload and argument validation.
- Diff scan found no added `Task.Delay`, `WaitUntilAsync`, `Thread.Sleep`, `[Skip]`, manual-category traits, or `Assert.True(true)` in touched `*.cs`/`*.proto` tests, and `tools/ci/test_polling_allowlist.txt` is not modified.
## What would change your verdict (only if comment or reject)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
eanzhao
added
crnd:phase:fixing
📊 状态卡片 — fix 派出
🤖 controller status banner ⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 测试视角 Review：approveTL;DR
测试覆盖结论本轮只看测试角度。核心行为都有对应断言：actor-owned cancellation 表示取消由 覆盖点：
未发现新增 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: tests
head_sha: f9aa0631f2b2e4a718b1a4f49518ab93077af7fe
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the changed tests cover the new actor-owned cancellation and batched forwarded-tool recording behavior with concrete assertions, and I found no test-stability or assertion-loosening blockers.
## Evidence
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/ResponsesCommandFacadeTests.cs:427` asserts invisible cancels do not write status, then visible cancels call `CancelRunAsync` with `("actor-1", "resp_1", "resp_1:llm-run")`; `:470` also covers actor rejection mapping to `response_cancel_rejected`.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Infrastructure/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapterTests.cs:113` covers the new public `CancelRunAsync` path by unpacking `CancelLlmRunRequested`, checking `response_id`, `run_id`, and timestamp; `:127` covers argument validation.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Core/LlmSessionGAgentTests.cs:803` covers actor-owned cancel state/event persistence through `LlmRunCancelled`; `:1564` verifies forwarded tool calls are no longer emitted via the removed standalone event and are instead batched on `LlmRunCompleted`.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunCoreTests.cs:48` asserts forwarded tool calls now appear in `LlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records`, and `:140` covers the new `LlmRunRecordDecision` stop behavior by ensuring no terminal records are written after the sink stops.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Application/LlmRunExecutorTests.cs:145` verifies off-actor executor dispatch now sends two chunks plus one `RecordLlmRunCompleted` carrying `ForwardedToolCallRecords`; `:646` uses a committed-record observation fake rather than mock-only call-count verification.
- `test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Projection/LlmSessionsProtoSurfaceRegressionTests.cs:70` adds schema-surface regression coverage for `CancelLlmRunRequested` and `forwarded_tool_call_records`, while `:56` asserts the deleted `RecordLlmForwardedToolCallEmitted` surface stays absent.
- Static diff checks found no added `[Skip]`, manual category traits, `Task.Delay`, `WaitUntilAsync`, `Thread.Sleep`, or `Assert.True(true)` in the touched tests; changed timeout usage is bounded cancellation around `TaskCompletionSource` waits, not polling pacing.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 架构复审通过TL;DR
架构证据本轮重点确认了两个事实: LLM run 取消回到
同时检查了 host policy: 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)---
pr: 2292
role: architect
head_sha: f9aa0631f2b2e4a718b1a4f49518ab93077af7fe
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
approve - no architectural compliance concern found; the diff keeps LLM run cancellation and forwarded-tool terminal facts under the LlmSessionGAgent authority.
## Evidence
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:185` adds `CancelLlmRunRequested`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:315` / `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Protos/llm_sessions.proto:326` carry forwarded tool records as typed proto fields on run completion. This matches CLAUDE.md: "核心语义强类型：影响业务语义、控制流、稳定读取且仓库内可控的数据，必须建模为 `proto field / typed option / typed sub-message`，禁止塞入通用 bag。"
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:162` reads the visible response via query/readmodel, while `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/ResponsesCommandFacade.cs:185` requests cancellation through `CancelRunAsync` instead of writing a facade-owned terminal status. This matches CLAUDE.md: "读写分离：`Command -> Event`，`Query -> ReadModel`；异步完成通过事件通知，不在会话内拼装流程。"
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Infrastructure/Adapters/LlmSessionRegistrationAdapter.cs:99` dispatches `CancelLlmRunRequested` through `IActorDispatchPort`, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:277` handles it inside the session actor by persisting `LlmRunCancelled`. This matches CLAUDE.md: "单一权威拥有者：每个稳定业务事实有唯一 actor 拥有；`committed event store + actor state` 是唯一真相，readmodel 只是查询副本。"
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:763` applies `LlmRunCompleted` in the actor and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:781` upserts forwarded-tool records during that same actor-owned transition. This matches CLAUDE.md: "面向对象内聚：同一业务实体的状态、命令处理、事件发布在同一个 actor 内完成；禁止将数据和方法拆分到不同 actor 再拼装。"
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:279` waits for committed observation before returning `LlmRunRecordDecision`, with terminal observed events stopping further dispatch at `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunExecutor.cs:385`. This matches CLAUDE.md: "ACK 诚实：同步返回只承诺已达到阶段（默认 `accepted + stable command id`）；`committed`/`read-model observed` 等强保证须通过独立契约或异步观察获取。"
- No blocking issue found. `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Abstractions/Responses/LlmRunCoreContracts.cs:25` has one sink contract for run records with no separate forwarded-tool emission method, and `src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Application/Responses/LlmRunCore.cs:134` batches forwarded tool records into `LlmRunCompleted`. This matches CLAUDE.md: "单一主干，插件扩展：只保留一条权威业务主链路；新能力以插件/模块挂载，禁止平行\"第二系统\"。"
- Host policy checks: `HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY` is empty and normalizes to `none`; the added diff contains no new Old/New/iteration refactor-history source comments. `HOST_ARCHITECTURE_GREP_CHECKS` and `HOST_PROTO_POLICY` are empty, so no host-specific checks were invented. I found no new external repo reference, no host production SSOT moved into `.refactor-loop/`, no new `*WriteActor` / `*ReadActor` / `*Store` split, and no compatibility shim or parallel pathway.
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
REVIEW_DONE:2292:architect:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
🤖 质量审查结论: approveTL;DR
审查依据
📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)pr: 2292
|
eanzhao
added
crnd:phase:merged
🤖 PR 2292 fix round 2 blocked by missing worktreeTL;DR
处理细节本轮唯一 blocking reject 来自 quality reviewer： 是未被实例化的 actor 内 LLM run sink，会制造第二条未使用的记录路径。 指 actor 内部的 实现， 是 LLM run 执行过程向 actor 写回记录的窄接口。 我确认的正确修复是一个文件内删除：移除 中不可达的 ，以及它独占使用的 stream/tool/completed/failed persistence helpers。 被 reviewer 一并引用，但它也被真实的 使用；因此不能按“只服务 dead sink”整体删除，而应保留 actor-owned cancellation 语义并简化为直接持久化 。 是 actor 拥有的 run 取消事实。 验证曾在 transient worktree 上通过： Determining projects to restore... Build succeeded. /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/agents/Aevatar.GAgents.NyxidChat/Aevatar.GAgents.NyxidChat.csproj : warning NU1510: PackageReference Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions will not be pruned. Consider removing this package from your dependencies, as it is likely unnecessary. [/Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/aevatar.slnx] Time Elapsed 00:00:27.74 0 errors， Determining projects to restore... Passed! - Failed: 0, Passed: 896, Skipped: 0, Total: 896, Duration: 5 s - Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests.dll (net10.0) 946 passed。收尾时 已不在 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar worktree /private/tmp/aevatar-pr2238-review worktree /private/tmp/aevatar-voice-ci-fix worktree /Users/chronoai/.paseo/worktrees/32qtkk8z/calm-mayfly worktree /Users/chronoai/.paseo/worktrees/32qtkk8z/honest-moose worktree /Users/chronoai/.paseo/worktrees/32qtkk8z/jobless-moose worktree /Users/chronoai/.paseo/worktrees/32qtkk8z/soggy-dog worktree /Users/chronoai/.paseo/worktrees/32qtkk8z/sticky-monkey worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/.forge-worktrees/session/aevatar-session-d58127e4 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.refactor-loop/worktrees/review-pr2238-quality-r1 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/dev-sync worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1877-lark-approval-bridge worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1913 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1917-file-ingress-store worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1932-feature-integrate worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1932-n8n-epic-closeout worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1958 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1959 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1960 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1981-1983 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1985-skill-recovery-callid worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1988-nyxid-chat-stream-frames worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-1999-2004-lark-tool-approval worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2000-2002-chat-attachments worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2003-runtime-callback-storage worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2005-one-shot-reminder worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2007-voice-realtime-frames worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2008-voice-input-image-ingress worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2009-voice-edge-tools-design worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2035-skillrunner-scheduled-dispatch worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2126 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2126-clean worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2131 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-2132 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/issue-undefined worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter1904-issue-1904 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter1937-issue-1937 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter1939-issue-1939 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter1943-issue-1943 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2175-issue-2175 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2176-issue-2176 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2178-issue-2178 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2178-issue-2178-clean worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2179-issue-2179 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2180-issue-2180 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2181-issue-2181 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2269-issue-2269 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2274-issue-2274 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2276-issue-2276 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2286-issue-2286 worktree /Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/merge-milestone-23 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f9aa0631f2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| await dispatch(recordId, command, observeCt).ConfigureAwait(false); | ||
| await foreach (var envelope in sink.ReadAllAsync(observeCt).ConfigureAwait(false)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a run is cancelled or times out between two executor records, this code opens a new live-only projection subscription after the terminal event has already been published, then dispatches the next record and waits for a matching event. LlmSessionGAgent.TryPrepareRunRecord returns false for terminal runs without publishing anything, so ReadAllAsync can sit until recordObservationTimeout (default 5 minutes) and the executor then records executor_failed instead of stopping promptly. Please re-check the current run/read-model state before waiting, or treat a no-op dispatch against an already-terminal run as Stop.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🤖 PR 2292 fix round 2 blocked by missing worktree（修正版）TL;DR
处理细节本轮唯一 blocking reject 来自 quality reviewer： 我确认的正确修复是一个文件内删除：移除 验证曾在 transient worktree 上通过： 📎 完整 codex 原始输出(存档备查)# Fix report for PR 2292 round 2
## Applied
- none; the concrete in-scope cleanup was made in the PR worktree and validated, but `/Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2275-issue-2275` disappeared before completion, so the source change is not present on `refactor/iter2275-issue-2275`.
## Rejected as false positive
- src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs:1062 cited by reviewer:quality: `PersistRunCancelledAsync` is not only support code for `InActorLlmRunSink`; `git show refactor/iter2275-issue-2275:src/platform/Aevatar.GAgentService.Core/GAgents/LlmSessionGAgent.cs | rg -n "HandleCancelLlmRunRequestedAsync|PersistRunCancelledAsync|InActorLlmRunSink"` shows `HandleCancelLlmRunRequestedAsync` calls it at line 302, while `InActorLlmRunSink` also calls it at line 1150. Deleting cancellation behavior would contradict `CLAUDE.md`'s actor-owned terminal fact requirement; the intended fix is to keep actor cancellation and delete the unreachable sink-only stream/tool/completed/failed helpers plus the nested sink.
## Blocked (cannot fix this round)
- reviewer:quality's demand to delete `InActorLlmRunSink`: blocked by missing writable PR worktree. `git worktree list --porcelain` no longer lists `/Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.worktrees/iter2275-issue-2275`, and `git branch --list 'refactor/iter2275-issue-2275' -vv` still points at `f9aa0631`, where `git show` proves `InActorLlmRunSink` remains. The prompt forbids checkout, so I cannot recreate the PR worktree or reapply the patch safely in this role.
## Build status
- build: pass for the transient edit before the worktree disappeared (`dotnet build aevatar.slnx --nologo`; 142 warnings, 0 errors), but the branch is not durably fixed.
- tests: pass for the transient edit before the worktree disappeared (`dotnet test test/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests/Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests.csproj --nologo`; 946 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped), but the branch is not durably fixed.
- full solution tests: n=skipped per prompt instruction to run changed test projects only, not the full solution test suite.
- review-thread-completion: not applicable; `/Users/chronoai/Code/aevatar/.refactor-loop/state/review-thread-completion/pr2292.json` is absent.
## Recommendation for next round
- controller routes to reflector/meta-layer; the branch needs a writable PR worktree restored before applying the already-identified one-file cleanup.
- refactor self-doc: not applicable (HOST_REFACTOR_COMMENT_POLICY=none)
- FIX_BLOCKED:2292:round-2:other:pr-worktree-missing
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
FIX_BLOCKED:2292:round-2:other:pr-worktree-missing⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
1 participant
Changed files
实现 actor-owned run cancellation：
/cancel通过CancelLlmRunRequested进入LlmSessionGAgent，facade 的观察超时、客户端断开和观察到终态不再写 genericCancelled/Failedrun fact。收窄 LLM executor record sink：
ILlmRunSink返回LlmRunRecordDecision，executor 在 inactive/stop ack 后停止继续 dispatch；forwarded-tool terminal output 合并到LlmRunCompleted.forwarded_tool_call_records，由 actor 单 turn 物化。补充 GAgentService 与 Capabilities 行为测试，覆盖 actor-owned cancel、sink stop decision、batched forwarded-tool records、facade observation lifecycle 和 adapter envelope contract。
Test results
dotnet build aevatar.slnx --nologo通过；test_stability_guards.sh、architecture_guards.sh通过；Aevatar.GAgentService.Tests、Aevatar.Capabilities.Tests通过；第二次dotnet test aevatar.slnx --nologo全量通过。第一次全量测试中一个 unrelated runtime-hosting retry 集成测试超时，随后该单测隔离重跑通过。Deviations
无 scope extension。未改 docs；共识 artifact 指定无 Philosophy/CLAUDE.md/SPEC/Tier 变更。Closes #2275
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧