Renamed CI gate job to the standard "Required checks pass" check#26
Conversation
Branch protection previously required the check named "All tests pass", which couples the ruleset to this repo's particular CI job naming. The org is standardizing every repo on a single stable aggregator check named "Required checks pass", so rulesets can require one identical context everywhere regardless of how the underlying test matrix evolves. The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require the new check name, so this change must go green on the new gate before merge.
|
Bugbot is not enabled for this team, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 22 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Why
Branch protection on this repo currently requires a status check named exactly
All tests pass. Requiring individual or legacy check names couples branch protection to the CI matrix: rename a job (or change what the workflow contains) and the required check silently stops existing, blocking every PR.The org is standardizing every repo on a single stable aggregator check named
Required checks pass(per therepo-ci-required-checkconvention), so rulesets can require one identical context everywhere.What
all-tests-pass->required-checks-passwithname: Required checks pass. Theif: always(),needs: [test]coverage, and the failure-detection step are unchanged.permissions: contents: readwas already present.Note for reviewers
The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require
Required checks passinstead ofAll tests pass, so this PR must go green on the new gate before merge.