Skip to content

Update IdentityVerification.yml#28

Open
ABISprotocol wants to merge 1 commit into
CryptoConsortium:masterfrom
ABISprotocol:patch-2
Open

Update IdentityVerification.yml#28
ABISprotocol wants to merge 1 commit into
CryptoConsortium:masterfrom
ABISprotocol:patch-2

Conversation

@ABISprotocol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Extending details and distinctions of IdentityVerification proposed as tiered process for either organization members (staff) or users of organization (e.g., exchange, brokerage, etc.). Includes traditional and decentralized identification methods.

Extending details and distinctions of IdentityVerification proposed as tiered process for either organization members (staff) or users of organization (e.g., exchange, brokerage, etc.).  Includes traditional and decentralized identification methods.
@Abstrct

Abstrct commented Nov 4, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Typical methods of identity verification which are necessary for staff or consultants working for organizations (exchanges, brokerages, etc.) include:

Methods of identity verification which could be deemed necessary for users (of an exchange, brokerage, web wallet, etc.) might include:

Providing a tiered list of suggestions is a good idea, but I don't believe it should be organized based on who is being verified. I think the when and why of the verification is just as important. It may also be purely a business decision which one is used, so we need to be careful not to be too prescriptive, just provide a benchmark of effectiveness and prescribe strength where we all agree it is required.

I'm not as familiar with all the new options as I'd like to be (namely BlockchainMe & Blockchain ID), so I'm going to do a bit more research on those for the time being.

Overall, good idea though. Thanks for the contribution!

@ABISprotocol

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks, I look forward to further comments on this idea, and have left it open so that the people with commit ability on this repo can change it prior to merge if you'd like. Let me know if there are any issues there.

@Ekinmayer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks

@Johnyyy71 Johnyyy71 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3AFrYMt3LfsFEURVyj8xW8UCCiQMPZX64r

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants