Skip to content

doc - clarify LLM review expectations #2011

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jeremylt wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

doc - clarify LLM review expectations #2011

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ LLMs may be used to aid the development of code for pull requests (PR); however,
The human creating the PR is ultimately responsible for the content in the PR.
PRs must disclose and describe all LLM usage.

If a reviewer requests that the review conversation be conducted with human-to-human communication and not LLMs, this request should be respected.
The individual submitting the PR is responsible for being able to articulate and discuss the changes in the PR with reviewers, even if an LLM was used to generate the code changes in the PR.

## Authorship

libCEED contains components authored by many individuals.
Expand Down
Loading