Skip to content

{CI} Sync squad mapping labels from ADO Wiki to resourceManagement.yml#33585

Closed
azclibot wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:devfrom
azclibot:sync_squad_mapping_323302
Closed

{CI} Sync squad mapping labels from ADO Wiki to resourceManagement.yml#33585
azclibot wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:devfrom
azclibot:sync_squad_mapping_323302

Conversation

@azclibot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR synchronizes squad labels in resourceManagement.yml based on the Squad Mapping ADO wiki page.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 18, 2026 11:24
@azure-client-tools-bot-prd

azure-client-tools-bot-prd Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
️✔️AzureCLI-FullTest
️✔️acr
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️acs
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️advisor
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️ams
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️apim
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️appconfig
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️appservice
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️aro
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️backup
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️batch
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️batchai
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️billing
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️botservice
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️cdn
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️cloud
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️cognitiveservices
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️compute_recommender
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️computefleet
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️config
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️configure
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️consumption
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️container
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️containerapp
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️core
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️cosmosdb
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️databoxedge
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️dls
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️dms
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️eventgrid
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️eventhubs
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️feedback
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️find
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️hdinsight
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️identity
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️iot
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️keyvault
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️lab
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️managedservices
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️maps
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️marketplaceordering
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️monitor
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️mysql
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️netappfiles
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️network
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️policyinsights
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️postgresql
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️privatedns
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️profile
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️rdbms
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️redis
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️relay
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️resource
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️role
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️search
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️security
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️servicebus
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️serviceconnector
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️servicefabric
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️signalr
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️sql
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️sqlvm
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️storage
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️synapse
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️telemetry
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️util
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14
️✔️vm
️✔️latest
️✔️3.12
️✔️3.14

@azure-client-tools-bot-prd

azure-client-tools-bot-prd Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
️✔️AzureCLI-BreakingChangeTest
️✔️Non Breaking Changes

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the GitHub policy configuration in resourceManagement.yml to keep squad-routing metadata in sync with the “Squad Mapping” ADO wiki, ensuring issues/PRs get the appropriate squad labels, mentions, and (where applicable) review requests.

Changes:

  • Add additional squad mentionees entries in relevant mentionUsers blocks based on the squad mapping.
  • Add additional addLabel actions to apply mapped squad labels alongside existing labels.
  • Add additional requestReview actions on PR-routing rules to include mapped squad reviewers.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@jsntcy jsntcy closed this Jun 18, 2026
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ configuration:
mentionees:
- Azure/deployments-owners
- act-codegen-extensibility-squad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

act-codegen-extensibility-squad is just a label, but not a team, we should mention a team.

mentionees:
- Azure/deployments-owners
- act-codegen-extensibility-squad
- Azure/act-identity-squad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Our logic should replace existing mentionees instead of appending to them.

- addLabel:
label: act-codegen-extensibility-squad
- addLabel:
label: act-experience-enablement-squad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should replace the label act-codegen-extensibility-squad instead of appending to the end.

- requestReview:
reviewer: act-codegen-extensibility-squad
- requestReview:
reviewer: act-observability-squad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should replace existing reviewers instead of appending to it.

@@ -7052,13 +7121,17 @@ configuration:
reviewer: yonzhan
- requestReview:
reviewer: act-codegen-extensibility-squad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

act-codegen-extensibility-squad is a label, but not a team. We should assign to a team to review, such as Azure/act-codegen-extensibility-squad.

@jsntcy jsntcy requested a review from a0x1ab June 18, 2026 14:12
@jsntcy

jsntcy commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@a0x1ab, It seems the sync logic is not correct and added some comments above.

@a0x1ab

a0x1ab commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you Yu, I shall work on fixing this now 🫡

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants