Parent: #108
Goal
Define the remaining canonical workshop-rs source-preservation contract for authored Workshop comments/trivia and mixed-source consumers without introducing a second opaque representation for Workshop semantics that the current WIR already models canonically.
Current status
Rebaselined from the original workshop-rs 0.1.1 premise.
The current raw Workshop parser/WIR/validation/emitter surface now represents ordinary supported Workshop semantics canonically. A source-language consumer embedding vanilla Workshop should therefore parse/use that canonical representation rather than require a DEL-local or workshop-rs opaque/raw rule model merely because the source originated inside another language.
The durable remaining owner-side question is source preservation: authored comments/trivia and any source-level attachment/provenance needed for safe mixed-source tooling and reconstruction.
Context
del-rs Issue #32 and historical Draft PR #42 provide consumer evidence for source files that mix DEL/OSTW constructs with vanilla Workshop blocks and comments. workshop-rs owns the Workshop-language representation and preservation semantics; del-rs owns how its source grammar embeds/resolves those regions.
Scope
- Define which Workshop comments/trivia are preserved as part of the public source/WIR contract and which are presentation-only/non-semantic.
- Define stable attachment/provenance semantics for authored rule/action/condition/settings comments where preservation is supported.
- Preserve enough source structure for diagnostics, source-aware editing, and useful reconstruction without requiring exact whole-file formatting reproduction.
- Ensure embedded supported vanilla Workshop content uses the same canonical parser/WIR/validation/emitter path as standalone raw Workshop.
- Define explicit failure/incompleteness behavior for malformed, genuinely unsupported, legacy, or evidence-insufficient embedded Workshop content.
- Add focused parse/preserve/edit/emit/reparse evidence for comments and mixed-source Workshop regions where the owner-side contract applies.
- Keep the contract suitable for consumers other than DEL/OSTW.
Non-goals
- A second opaque/raw WIR representation for ordinary supported Workshop semantics.
- DEL/OSTW grammar, project loading, source embedding syntax, or runtime lowering.
- Exact formatting/trivia identity for untouched whole files unless separately required by a source-edit contract.
- Full pretty-printer regeneration as the default edit model.
- Workshop-to-DEL decompilation.
- A provider-local catalog or emitter.
Acceptance criteria
- Ordinary embedded Workshop constructs use the same canonical Workshop semantic representation as standalone raw Workshop.
- A reviewed public contract defines supported comment/trivia preservation and attachment/provenance behavior.
- Supported source-aware edits can preserve unrelated comments/trivia and structure rather than requiring full regeneration.
- Malformed/unsupported embedded content fails or remains explicitly incomplete without guessed semantics.
- Parser/WIR/emitter/source APIs provide enough stable provenance for consumers to explain and preserve authored Workshop content.
del-rs and future consumers can integrate through public Workshop source/semantic APIs without copying parser/catalog/emitter logic or inventing a parallel raw Workshop model.
Relationships
Parent: #108
Goal
Define the remaining canonical
workshop-rssource-preservation contract for authored Workshop comments/trivia and mixed-source consumers without introducing a second opaque representation for Workshop semantics that the current WIR already models canonically.Current status
Rebaselined from the original
workshop-rs 0.1.1premise.The current raw Workshop parser/WIR/validation/emitter surface now represents ordinary supported Workshop semantics canonically. A source-language consumer embedding vanilla Workshop should therefore parse/use that canonical representation rather than require a DEL-local or
workshop-rsopaque/raw rule model merely because the source originated inside another language.The durable remaining owner-side question is source preservation: authored comments/trivia and any source-level attachment/provenance needed for safe mixed-source tooling and reconstruction.
Context
del-rsIssue #32 and historical Draft PR #42 provide consumer evidence for source files that mix DEL/OSTW constructs with vanilla Workshop blocks and comments.workshop-rsowns the Workshop-language representation and preservation semantics;del-rsowns how its source grammar embeds/resolves those regions.Scope
Non-goals
Acceptance criteria
del-rsand future consumers can integrate through public Workshop source/semantic APIs without copying parser/catalog/emitter logic or inventing a parallel raw Workshop model.Relationships
del-rsDefine the canonical Workshop comment and source-preservation contract #32 and equivalent future source-language repositories.