Summary
Add true pause-and-resume support for long-running scan jobs.
The current runtime already supports starting jobs, reporting status, and cancelling running scan/report work. What is missing is a resumable execution model that can stop work intentionally without discarding useful progress.
Current State
- scan and report jobs have active job-state tracking
- cancellation exists
- the UI already exposes pause/resume affordances, but there is no real resumable backend workflow behind them
Remaining Problem
Today, interrupting a long-running scan effectively means cancellation. Users cannot pause work and later continue from a stable checkpoint.
For large networks or long report-generation flows, that means:
- partial progress is lost
- long operations must restart from the beginning
- the existing UI controls are more suggestive than real
Proposed Scope
- Execution Model
- define what can realistically be paused and resumed
- distinguish between quick scan, deep scan, chunked report scan, and PDF-only tasks
- prefer resumable checkpoints at safe workflow boundaries instead of pretending every subprocess can be suspended transparently
- State Persistence
- store enough progress to resume meaningfully
- preserve discovered results and remaining work units where practical
- avoid duplicate scanning when resuming from chunked or multi-target work
- UI Behavior
- make pause/resume controls reflect actual backend capability
- show whether a job is pausable, paused, resuming, or only cancellable
Implementation Notes
Likely touch points in the current architecture:
- job registry and job-status events
- scan/report workflow orchestration
- frontend job controls and status rendering
This should be designed around checkpointed workflow resumption, not around attempting to suspend arbitrary nmap subprocesses mid-packet.
Summary
Add true pause-and-resume support for long-running scan jobs.
The current runtime already supports starting jobs, reporting status, and cancelling running scan/report work. What is missing is a resumable execution model that can stop work intentionally without discarding useful progress.
Current State
Remaining Problem
Today, interrupting a long-running scan effectively means cancellation. Users cannot pause work and later continue from a stable checkpoint.
For large networks or long report-generation flows, that means:
Proposed Scope
Implementation Notes
Likely touch points in the current architecture:
This should be designed around checkpointed workflow resumption, not around attempting to suspend arbitrary
nmapsubprocesses mid-packet.