Sentinel-2 eo:cloud_cover versus s2:high_proba_clouds_percentage #218
Scott Henderson (scottyhq)
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Just documenting something that may already be well-known by regular sentinel-2 users, but I found surprising, which is that the
eo:cloud_coverestimate can be very poor in some regions.eo:cloud_coveris standard in STAC so it's a reasonable starting place for workflows, including the PC S2 L2a Example NotebookIt looks like
eo:cloud_coveris copied fromCLOUDY_PIXEL_PERCENTAGEin the original metadata, but there are other cloud probability classes likes2:high_proba_clouds_percentagein STAC metadata which may be better suited for filtering searches in certain areas (MGRS 45RVM shown below) .You might accidentally omit a lot of good scenes depending on which of these fields you use!
All reactions